Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 12:5:29.
doi: 10.1038/s41394-019-0170-3. eCollection 2019.

A single-subject study of robotic upper limb training in the subacute phase for four persons with cervical spinal cord injury

Linda Sørensen  1 , Grethe Månum  1
Affiliations

A single-subject study of robotic upper limb training in the subacute phase for four persons with cervical spinal cord injury

Linda Sørensen et al. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. .

Abstract

Study design: Single-subject design, standard training ("B") compared with Robotic training ("C").

Objectives: To explore the impact of robotic training on upper limb function, activities of daily living (ADL) and training experience in subacute tetraplegic inpatients.

Setting: Inpatient subacute Norwegian spinal cord injury (SCI) unit.

Methods: Four participants (C4-7, AIS A-C) completed 11 sessions of robotic training using a passive robotic exoskeleton (Armeo Spring®). Descriptive statistics and visual analyses were used for comparing standard occupational therapy and robotic training. Outcome measures included the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-III), the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP), and a questionnaire.

Results: All of the participants exhibited an increase in assessments of upper limb function (GRASSP-total) right side (0.4%-61.2%), and all except for one participant (-8%) showed an increase on their left side (20.9%-106.2%). Three out of four participants had improvements in ADL function SCIM-III (ranging from 5.6% to 46.7%). Results demonstrated improvements during the robotic intervention period in five out of 28 measurements. The participants enjoyed the exercise, and found it motivating and relevant to their injury (median ranged from 3.5 to 6.5 on a 0-7 scale).

Conclusions: Three out of four participants improved upper limb function and ADL independence, but the study could not confirm that improvements were due to the robotic intervention. The participants enjoyed the robotic training and found it relevant to their injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standardsThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Armeo Spring set up. Picture by Hocoma®
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Total score for Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) for patient 1–4 right and left hand, with trendlines (dotted line) and overlap lines inserted. Maximum score is 116. The “B” represents the standard occupational therapy phases and “C” the robotic–intervention period
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harvey L. Management of Spinal Cord Injuries. A guide for physiotherapists. USA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008:93–105.
    1. Anderson K. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1371–83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snoek GJ, Jzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F. Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2004;42:526–32. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101638. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zbogar D, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Krassioukov AV, Verrier MC. Movement repetitions in physical and occupational therapy during spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2017;52:172–9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.129. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Sensory stimulation augments the effects of massed practice training in persons with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:602–8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.021. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types