The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery
- PMID: 31240416
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02028-4
The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery
Abstract
Background: Anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery is a severe complication associated with poorer oncologic outcome and quality of life. Preoperative assessment of the risk for anastomotic leak is a key component of surgical planning, including the opportunity to create a defunctioning stoma.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify and quantify the risk factors for anastomotic leak to minimize risk by either not restoring bowel continuity or protecting the anastomosis with a temporary diverting stoma.
Methods: Potentially relevant studies were identified from the following databases: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. This meta-analysis included studies on transabdominal resection for rectal cancer that reported data about anastomotic leak. The risk for anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery was investigated. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors were extracted and used to compare anastomotic leak rates. All variables demonstrating a p value < 0.1 in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to determine the risk factors for anastomotic leak.
Results: Twenty-six centers provided individual data on 9735 patients. Selected preoperative covariates (time before surgery, age, gender, smoking, previous abdominal surgery, BMI, diabetes, ASA, hemoglobin level, TNM classification stage, anastomotic distance) were used as independent factors in a logistic regression model with anastomotic leak as dependent variable. With a threshold value of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve corresponding to 0.0791 in the training set, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.585 (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of the model's probability > 0.0791 to identify anastomotic leak were 79.1% and 32.9%, respectively. Accuracy of the threshold value was confirmed in the validation set with 77.8% sensitivity and 35.2% specificity.
Conclusions: We trust that, with further refinement using prospective data, this nomogram based on preoperative risk factors may assist surgeons in decision making. The score is now available online ( http://www.real-score.org ).
Keywords: Anastomotic leak; Rectal cancer; Score.
Comment in
-
A comment on "The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery" by Arezzo A et al.Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Feb;25(2):245-246. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02351-1. Epub 2020 Oct 3. Tech Coloproctol. 2021. PMID: 33011898 No abstract available.
-
The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery.Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Feb;25(2):247-248. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02409-8. Epub 2021 Jan 15. Tech Coloproctol. 2021. PMID: 33449257 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A Nomogram to Predict Anastomotic Leakage in Open Rectal Surgery-Hope or Hype?J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Sep;22(9):1619-1630. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3782-1. Epub 2018 May 18. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018. PMID: 29777457
-
[Risk factor analysis on anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patient with neoadjuvant therapy and establishment of a nomogram prediction model].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;22(8):748-754. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.08.009. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31422613 Chinese.
-
A nomogram of anastomotic stricture after rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3661-3671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10885-w. Epub 2024 May 22. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38777891
-
Predicting the risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer.Acta Chir Iugosl. 2010;57(3):47-50. doi: 10.2298/aci1003047m. Acta Chir Iugosl. 2010. PMID: 21066983 Review.
-
A meta-analysis of the role of diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):445-455. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03771-z. Epub 2020 Oct 16. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 33064212 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk Nomogram Does Not Predict Anastomotic Leakage After Colon Surgery Accurately: Results of the Multi-center LekCheck Study.J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Apr;26(4):900-910. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05119-6. Epub 2022 Jan 8. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022. PMID: 34997466
-
Risks of anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal cancer after operation and how to effectively avoid it.Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Sept 28;46(9):1031-1040. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.200569. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021. PMID: 34707015 Free PMC article. Chinese, English.
-
Comparison of two bundles for reducing surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre cohort study.BJS Open. 2024 Jul 2;8(4):zrae080. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae080. BJS Open. 2024. PMID: 39107075 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Establishment and application of three predictive models of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer sphincter-preserving surgery.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct 27;15(10):2201-2210. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2201. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023. PMID: 37969722 Free PMC article.
-
Machine learning and deep learning to improve prevention of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):101772. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.101772. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025. PMID: 39872776 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources