Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):853-859.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1744.

Outcomes After Inguinal Hernia Repair With Mesh Performed by Medical Doctors and Surgeons in Ghana

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Outcomes After Inguinal Hernia Repair With Mesh Performed by Medical Doctors and Surgeons in Ghana

Jessica H Beard et al. JAMA Surg. .

Abstract

Importance: Inguinal hernia is the most common general surgical condition in the world. Although task sharing of surgical care with nonsurgeons represents one method to increase access to essential surgery, the safety and outcomes of this strategy are not well described for hernia repair.

Objective: To compare outcomes after inguinal hernia repair with mesh performed by medical doctors and surgeons in Ghana.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted from February 15, 2017, to September 17, 2018, at the Volta Regional Hospital in Ho, Ghana. Following successful completion of a training course, 3 medical doctors and 2 surgeons performed inguinal hernia repair with mesh according to the Lichtenstein technique on 242 men with primary, reducible inguinal hernia.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was hernia recurrence at 1 year. The noninferiority limit was set at 5 percentage points. Secondary end points included postoperative complications at 2 weeks and patient satisfaction, pain, and self-assessed health status at 1 year.

Results: Two-hundred forty-two patients were included; 119 men underwent operations performed by medical doctors and 123 men underwent operations performed by surgeons. Preoperative patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Two-hundred thirty-seven patients (97.9%) were seen at follow-up at 2 weeks, and 223 patients (92.1%) were seen at follow-up at 1 year. The absolute difference in recurrence rate between the medical doctor group (1 [0.9%]) and the surgeon group (3 [2.8%]) was -1.9 (1-tailed 95% CI, -4.8; P < .001), demonstrating noninferiority of the medical doctors. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications (34 [29.1%] vs 29 [24.2%]), patient satisfaction (112 [98.2%] vs 108 [99.1%]), severe chronic pain (1 [0.9%] vs 4 [3.7%]), or self-assessed health (85.9 vs 83.7 of 100) for medical doctors and surgeons.

Conclusions and relevance: This study shows that medical doctors can be trained to perform elective inguinal hernia repair with mesh in men with good results and high patient satisfaction in a low-resource setting. This finding supports surgical task sharing to combat the global burden of hernia disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Beard and Ohene-Yeboah reported receiving grants from the Americas Hernia Society, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Association for Innovative Surgical Technology, and Temple University Office of International Affairs during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from Johnson & Johnson GenH Challenge outside the submitted work. Dr Wladis reported receiving grants from Swedish Scientific Council during the conduct of the study. Dr Löfgren reported receiving grants from the Swedish Research Council and a research stipend given for this study through the Swedish Association for Innovative Surgical Technology from B. Braun, Johnson & Johnson, Olympus, and Karl Storz during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Flowchart of Patients Included in the Study
When patients excluded from analysis were deducted, the denominator at the start of the study was 242; at the 2-week follow-up, 237; and at the 1-year follow-up, 223. Some patients who were not seen at the 2-week follow-up were located and evaluated at the 1-year follow-up.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beard JH, Ohene-Yeboah M, Devries CR, Schecter WP. Hernia and hydrocele In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN, eds. Essential Surgery: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1). Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, World Bank; 2015:chap 9. - PubMed
    1. Patel HD, Groen RS, Kamara TB, et al. . An estimate of hernia prevalence in Sierra Leone from a nationwide community survey. Hernia. 2014;18(2):297-303. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1179-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ohene-Yeboah M, Beard JH, Frimpong-Twumasi B, Koranteng A, Mensah S. Prevalence of inguinal hernia in adult men in the Ashanti region of Ghana. World J Surg. 2016;40(4):806-812. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3335-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Löfgren J, Makumbi F, Galiwango E, et al. . Prevalence of treated and untreated groin hernia in eastern Uganda. Br J Surg. 2014;101(6):728-734. doi:10.1002/bjs.9457 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Primatesta P, Goldacre MJ. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25(4):835-839. doi:10.1093/ije/25.4.835 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms