Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 26;14(1):30.
doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0217-2.

Current practices and perceived implementation barriers for working with alcohol prevention in occupational health services: the WIRUS OHS study

Affiliations

Current practices and perceived implementation barriers for working with alcohol prevention in occupational health services: the WIRUS OHS study

Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen et al. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. .

Abstract

Background: Alcohol is associated with detrimental health and work performance outcomes, and one to three out of ten employees may benefit from interventions. The role of occupational health services (OHS) in alcohol prevention has received little attention in research. The primary aims of this study were to explore current practices of alcohol prevention targeting employees in occupational health settings, and examine whether and which perceived implementation barriers were associated with alcohol prevention activity. The secondary aim was to explore whether barriers were differentially associated with primary, secondary and tertiary prevention activities.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, survey data were collected from 295 OHS professionals in Norway in 2018. Data were analysed by means of descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, paired samples t-tests, and multivariate linear regression analyses.

Results: Overall, seven out of ten OHS professionals worked with alcohol-related cases less than monthly, while only one out of ten did so on a weekly basis. Their activities were more focused on tertiary prevention than on primary and secondary prevention. Physicians, psychologists and nurses reported to handle alcohol-related issues more often than occupational therapists and physical therapists. Higher levels of implementation barriers internal to the OHS' organisation (competence, time and resources) were associated with lower alcohol prevention activity. Barriers external to the OHS' organisation (barriers concerning employers and employees) were not. This pattern was evident for primary, secondary and tertiary prevention activities. A majority of OHS professionals agreed that employees' alcohol consumption constitute a public health challenge, and that OHS' should focus more on alcohol prevention targeting employees.

Conclusions: Occupational health settings at workplaces may be particularly serviceable for alcohol prevention programmes since the majority of the population is employed and the majority of employees consume alcohol. An increase in overall prevention activity, and a shift from mainly focusing on tertiary prevention to an increased emphasis on primary and secondary prevention, may both hinge on increased training of OHS professionals, emphasising knowledge on the importance of working with alcohol prevention, and training in administering alcohol prevention programmes. Making alcohol prevention a priority may also require increased allocation of time and resources.

Keywords: Alcohol consumption; Implementation; Occupational health services; Prevention; Workforce; Workplace interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual model of the relationships between alcohol consumption, drinking categories, risk levels, intervention recommendations and prevention levels. aBased on [32]; bBased on [31, 33]; cBased on [31]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Perceived barriers to implementing alcohol-preventive efforts in occupational health services (N = 295). Means and standard deviations. Visual analogue scales ranging from 1 (barrier to a very small extent) to 11 (barrier to a very large extent)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Holmqvist M, Hermansson U, Nilsen P. Towards increased alcohol intervention activity in Swedish occupational health services. Int J Occup Med Env. 2008;21:179–187. - PubMed
    1. Rantanen J, Lehtinen S, Valenti A, Iavicoli S. A global survey on occupational health services in selected international commission on occupational health (ICOH) member countries. BMC Public Health. 2017. 10.1186/s12889-017-4800-z. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lie A, Bjørnstad O. Accreditation of occupational health services in Norway. Occup Med-C. 2015;65:722–724. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ames GM, Grube JW, Moore RS. Social control and workplace drinking norms: a comparison of two organizational cultures. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61:203–219. - PubMed
    1. Kuokkanen M, Heljälä L. Early identification and brief intervention for risky drinkers in Finnish occupational health services. Scand J Work Env Hea. 2005;1:35–37.

Publication types