Charting the Path Forward for Risk Prediction in Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: International Validation of HALTHCC Among 4,089 Patients
- PMID: 31243778
- DOI: 10.1002/hep.30838
Charting the Path Forward for Risk Prediction in Liver Transplant for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: International Validation of HALTHCC Among 4,089 Patients
Abstract
Prognosticating outcomes in liver transplant (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) continues to challenge the field. Although Milan Criteria (MC) generalized the practice of LT for HCC and improved outcomes, its predictive character has degraded with increasing candidate and oncological heterogeneity. We sought to validate and recalibrate a previously developed, preoperatively calculated, continuous risk score, the Hazard Associated with Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HALTHCC), in an international cohort. From 2002 to 2014, 4,089 patients (both MC in and out [25.2%]) across 16 centers in North America, Europe, and Asia were included. A continuous risk score using pre-LT levels of alpha-fetoprotein, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium score, and tumor burden score was recalibrated among a randomly selected cohort (n = 1,021) and validated in the remainder (n = 3,068). This study demonstrated significant heterogeneity by site and year, reflecting practice trends over the last decade. On explant pathology, both vascular invasion (VI) and poorly differentiated component (PDC) increased with increasing HALTHCC score. The lowest-risk patients (HALTHCC 0-5) had lower rates of VI and PDC than the highest-risk patients (HALTHCC > 35) (VI, 7.7%[ 1.2-14.2] vs. 70.6% [48.3-92.9] and PDC:4.6% [0.1%-9.8%] vs. 47.1% [22.6-71.5]; P < 0.0001 for both). This trend was robust to MC status. This international study was used to adjust the coefficients in the HALTHCC score. Before recalibration, HALTHCC had the greatest discriminatory ability for overall survival (OS; C-index = 0.61) compared to all previously reported scores. Following recalibration, the prognostic utility increased for both recurrence (C-index = 0.71) and OS (C-index = 0.63). Conclusion: This large international trial validated and refined the role for the continuous risk metric, HALTHCC, in establishing pre-LT risk among candidates with HCC worldwide. Prospective trials introducing HALTHCC into clinical practice are warranted.
© 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Similar articles
-
Reframing the approach to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Longitudinal assessment with hazard associated with liver transplantation for HCC (HALTHCC) improves ablate and wait strategy.Hepatology. 2018 Oct;68(4):1448-1458. doi: 10.1002/hep.29907. Hepatology. 2018. PMID: 29604231
-
Development and validation of the HALT-HCC score to predict mortality in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Aug;2(8):595-603. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30106-1. Epub 2017 May 22. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. PMID: 28546007
-
A novel prognostic nomogram accurately predicts hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: analysis of 865 consecutive liver transplant recipients.J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):416-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.025. Epub 2014 Dec 27. J Am Coll Surg. 2015. PMID: 25690672
-
Determination of hepatocellular carcinoma grade by needle biopsy is unreliable for liver transplant candidate selection.Liver Transpl. 2017 Sep;23(9):1123-1132. doi: 10.1002/lt.24811. Liver Transpl. 2017. PMID: 28688158
-
Is It Time to Reconsider the Milan Criteria for Selecting Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Deceased-Donor Liver Transplantation?Hepatology. 2019 Mar;69(3):1324-1336. doi: 10.1002/hep.30278. Hepatology. 2019. PMID: 30229978 Review.
Cited by
-
Using Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Burden Score to Stratify Prognosis after Liver Transplantation.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 14;12(11):3372. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113372. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33202588 Free PMC article.
-
PET-Assessed Metabolic Tumor Volume Across the Spectrum of Solid-Organ Malignancies: A Review of the Literature.Biomedicines. 2025 Jan 7;13(1):123. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13010123. Biomedicines. 2025. PMID: 39857707 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model for predicting post-transplant hepatocellular cancer recurrence.Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023 Dec;43(12):1381-1385. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12468. Epub 2023 Oct 30. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37904670 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Hepatocellular cancer selection systems and liver transplantation: from the tower of babel to an ideal comprehensive score.Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1599-1614. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01078-4. Epub 2021 May 18. Updates Surg. 2021. PMID: 34003479 Free PMC article.
-
AFP score and metroticket 2.0 perform similarly and could be used in a "within-ALL" clinical decision tool.JHEP Rep. 2022 Dec 5;5(2):100644. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100644. eCollection 2023 Feb. JHEP Rep. 2022. PMID: 36691474 Free PMC article.
References
-
- El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1118-1127.
-
- El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: where are we? Where do we go? Hepatology 2014;60:1767-1775.
-
- Iwatsuki S, Starzl TE, Sheahan DG, Yokoyama I, Demetris AJ, Todo S, et al. Hepatic resection versus transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg 1991;214:221-229.
-
- Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology 1999;30:1434-1440.
-
- Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, Andreola S, Pulvirenti A, Bozzetti F, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996;334:693-700.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical