Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul;49(7):559-567.
doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0160.

A Technical Focus on Antegrade Dissection and Re-entry for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: a Practice Update for 2019

Affiliations
Review

A Technical Focus on Antegrade Dissection and Re-entry for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions: a Practice Update for 2019

Simon J Walsh et al. Korean Circ J. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are a commonly encountered lesion. These present in a diverse patient population with variable anatomy. Technical success rates of ~90% are achievable for CTO lesions in centers with appropriate expertise. Many lesions can be crossed with wire-based techniques. However, the most anatomically complex and technically challenging lesions will often require more advanced approaches such as retrograde access and/or the application of blunt dissection techniques in the vessel to safely navigate long and/or ambiguous CTO segments. Retrograde dissection and re-entry (RDR) and antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) strategies are often needed to treat such lesions. In many circumstances, ADR offers a safe and efficient means to successfully cross a CTO lesion. Therefore, operators must remain cognizant of the risks and benefits of differing technical approaches during CTO percutaneous coronary intervention, particularly when both ADR and RDR are feasible. This article provides an overview of the ADR technique in addition to updated approaches in contemporary clinical practice.

Keywords: Antegrade dissection and re-entry; Chronic total occlusion; Percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Simon J. Walsh, James C. Spratt, and Colm G. Hanratty are a consultant to Boston Scientific. And Simon J. Walsh was supported research funding from Boston Scientific. Another author has no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The CrossBoss and Stingray catheters.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example of ADR as a bailout for sub-intimal wire passage in contemporary practice. (A) There is a 25–30mm CTO of the mid RCA. (B) A Pilot 200 advances into the CTO and beyond the distal cap but is in a subintimal position. (C) Blunt dissection is not required, rather the micro-catheter is advanced to the landing zone to facilitate delivery of the Stingray. (D) The Stingray is exchanged into the vessel, inflated and orientated with the target vessel on the left of the balloon. (E) Final result after successful re-entry and vessel reconstruction.
ADR = antegrade dissection and re-entry; CTO = coronary chronic total occlusion; RCA = right coronary artery; RV = right ventricular; SIS = sub-intimal space.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Ideal anatomy for a primary ADR procedure using the CrossBoss and Stingray system
ADR = antegrade dissection and re-entry; CTO = coronary chronic total occlusion; PDA = posterior descending artery; PLV = posterolateral vessel.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Development of intramural hematoma and compression of the distal landing zone if the sub-intimal space is exposed to systemic blood flow.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Treatment of the lesion depicted in Figure 3. (A) A resistant proximal cap is crossed with a combination of a Confienza Pro 12 (Asahi Intecc) and Turnpike Gold (Teleflex). (B) The stiff wire is removed and swapped out for a low penetration force, polymer-jacketed knuckle wire. (C) The proximal cap is dilated with a 2.5mm balloon to facilitate the introduction of a Trapliner (Teleflex). (D) A CrossBoss is then used to complete a controlled dissection to the landing zone. (E) The Trapliner facilitates efficient delivery of a Stingray balloon to allow controlled re-entry to occur. (F) Final result after stent deployment and optimization.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Correct angiographic orientation of the Stingray balloon.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Examples of different disease burdens at the landing zone. The most rightward example is often amenable to re-entry with the Stingray wire, whereas many experienced operators are now using high penetration force wires for the scenario on the left.

References

    1. Song L, Maehara A, Finn MT, et al. Intravascular ultrasound analysis of intraplaque versus subintimal tracking in percutaneous intervention for coronary chronic total occlusions and association with procedural outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1011–1021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsujita K, Maehara A, Mintz GS, et al. Intravascular ultrasound comparison of the retrograde versus antegrade approach to percutaneous intervention for chronic total coronary occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:846–854. - PubMed
    1. Muhammad KI, Lombardi WL, Christofferson R, Whitlow PL. Subintimal guidewire tracking during successful percutaneous therapy for chronic coronary total occlusions: insights from an intravascular ultrasound analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79:43–48. - PubMed
    1. Colombo A, Mikhail GW, Michev I, et al. Treating chronic total occlusions using subintimal tracking and reentry: the STAR technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;64:407–411. - PubMed
    1. Carlino M, Godino C, Latib A, Moses JW, Colombo A. Subintimal tracking and re-entry technique with contrast guidance: a safer approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:790–796. - PubMed