Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 2;35(26):8716-8725.
doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00862. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

Effects of Moisture Contents on Shale Gas Recovery and CO2 Sequestration

Affiliations

Effects of Moisture Contents on Shale Gas Recovery and CO2 Sequestration

Juan Zhou et al. Langmuir. .

Abstract

Enhanced recovery of shale gas with CO2 injection has attracted extensive attention as it combines the advantages of improved efficiency of shale gas recovery and reduced greenhouse gas emissions via CO2 geological sequestration. On the other hand, the microscopic mechanism of enhanced shale gas recovery with CO2 injection and the influence of the subsurface water confined in the shale nanopores remain ambiguous. Here, we use grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations to investigate the effect of moisture on the shale gas recovery and CO2 sequestration by calculating the adsorption of CH4 and CO2 in dry and moist kerogen slit pores. Simulation results indicate that water accumulates in the form of clusters in the middle of the kerogen slit pore. Formation of water clusters in kerogen slit pores reduces pore filling by methane molecules, resulting in a decrease in the methane sorption capacity. For the sorption of CH4/CO2 binary mixtures in kerogen slit pores, the CH4 sorption capacity decreases as the moisture content increases, whereas the effect of moisture on CO2 sorption capacity is related to its mole fraction in the CH4/CO2 binary mixture. Furthermore, we propose a reference route for shale gas recovery and find that the pressure drawdown and CO2 injection exhibit different mechanisms for gas recovery. Pressure drawdown mainly extracts the CH4 molecules distributed in the middle of kerogen slit pores, while CO2 injection recovers CH4 molecules from the adsorption layer. When the water content increases, the recovery ratio of the pressure drawdown declines, while that of CO2 injection increases, especially in the first stage of CO2 injection. The CO2 sequestration efficiency is higher under higher water content. These findings provide the theoretical foundation for optimization of the shale gas recovery process, as well as effective CO2 sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Atomistic model of kerogen slit nanopore. The pore width is 2 nm. Carbon atoms are depicted by gray balls, hydrogen by white, oxygen by red, nitrogen by blue, and sulfur by purple.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methane density distributions in (a) 2 nm and (b) 4 nm kerogen slit pores under various bulk pressures and T = 338.15 K. Dashed lines represent the CH4 bulk density obtained from the NIST Chemistry Webbook.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Snapshots of CH4 and H2O molecules in a 2 nm kerogen slit nanopore at 338.15 K under different pressures: (a) 10, (b) 20, (c) 30, (d) 40, (e) 50, and (f) 60 MPa with an average water density of 0.186 g/cm3.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Methane density distributions in a 2 nm kerogen slit nanopore at different pressures: P = 10 MPa (blue) and 60 MPa (red), T = 338.15 K. The solid and dashed lines represent the CH4 density distribution under dry condition (ρH2Oave = 0 g/cm3) and moist condition (ρH2Oave = 0.186 g/cm3), respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Average density of methane confined in kerogen slit pores with pore widths (a) 2 nm and (b) 4 nm at 338.15 K. The black, red, and blue lines represent the CH4 adsorption at the dry condition and moist condition of different contents.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Density distributions of CH4 and CO2 molecules at 10 MPa and 338.15 K, respectively, in kerogen slit pores of widths (a) 2 nm and (b) 4 nm. The blue dashed lines represent the CH4 density distribution in single-component adsorption and the solid lines represent the CH4 and CO2 density distributions in a binary mixture with a mole fraction of 0.5. The black dashed lines represent the bulk density of CH4/CO2.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Average density of CH4 (left) and CO2 (right) in mixtures of different compositions confined in kerogen slit pores with pore widths of 2 nm (top) and 4 nm (bottom) under different pressures at 338.15 K.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Snapshots of CH4/H2O mixtures (top) and CH4/CO2/H2O mixtures (bottom) in 2 nm kerogen slit nanopores at 338.15 K under different bulk pressures: 10, 30, and 60 MPa from left to right with an average water density of 0.186 g/cm3. The mole fraction of CH4 in the CH4/CO2 binary mixtures is 0.5.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Total uptake of (a) CH4 and (b) CO2 molecules in mixtures of different compositions at 338.15 K in 2 nm kerogen slit nanopores with different moisture contents. The solid lines represent the mixtures with mole fractions of CH4/CO2 = 3:1, dashed lines CH4/CO2 = 1:1, and dotted lines CH4/CO2 = 1:3. The different colors represent different water contents: black for ρH2Oave = 0 g/cm3, red for ρH2Oave = 0.186 g/cm3, blue for ρH2Oave = 0.372 g/cm3.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Schematic representation of the shale gas recovery process. More information about the recovery process is provided in the Supporting Information.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Composition of fluids in the 2 nm kerogen slit pores during the gas recovery process with different moisture contents: (a, b) 0 g/cm3, (c, d) 0.186 g/cm3, and (e, f) 0.372 g/cm3. The arrows in the figure indicate the direction of the recovery process.
Figure 12
Figure 12
CH4 recovery ratio (a) and CO2 sequestration ratio (b) with respect to water content during the shale gas recovery process in 2 nm kerogen slit pores at 338.15 K.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Evolution of the CH4 density distributions inside the 2 nm kerogen slit pores during the gas recovery process with varying moisture contents: (a) 0 g/cm3, dry condition (b) 0.186 g/cm3, and (c) 0.372 g/cm3. The CO2 density distribution during the CO2 injection process is presented in Figure S10.

References

    1. Vidic R. D.; Brantley S. L.; Vandenbossche J. M.; Yoxtheimer D.; Abad J. D. Impact of Shale Gas Development on Regional Water Quality. Science 2013, 340, 123500910.1126/science.1235009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melikoglu M. Shale Gas: Analysis of Its Role in the Global Energy Market. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014, 37, 460–468. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.002. - DOI
    1. Arogundade O.; Sohrabi M.. A Review of Recent Developments and Challenges in Shale Gas Recovery, SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, 8–11 April 2012, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia, 2012.
    1. Middleton R.; Viswanathan H.; Currier R.; Gupta R. CO2 as a Fracturing Fluid: Potential for Commercial-Scale Shale Gas Production and CO2 Sequestration. Energy Procedia 2014, 63, 7780–7784. 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.812. - DOI
    1. Yang R.; Goktekin E.; Gleason K. K. Zwitterionic Antifouling Coatings for the Purification of High-Salinity Shale Gas Produced Water. Langmuir 2015, 31, 11895–11903. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02795. - DOI - PubMed