Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):1857-1864.
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1857.

Difficult Access and Poor Productivity: Mammography Screening in Brazil

Danielle Cristina Netto Rodrigues  1 , Ruffo Freitas-Junior  1 , Rosemar Macedo Sousa Rahal  1 , Rosangela da Silveira Correa  1 , João Emílio Peixoto  2 , Noely Vicente Ribeiro  3 , Nilson Clementino Ferreira  4 , Leonardo Ribeiro Soares  1
Affiliations

Difficult Access and Poor Productivity: Mammography Screening in Brazil

Danielle Cristina Netto Rodrigues et al. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. .

Abstract

Background: Factors that may hamper access to mammographic screening in any given region include socioeconomic limitations and the geographical distribution and quality of the mammography machines. This study evaluated access to breast cancer screening within the Brazilian National Health Service (SUS), the geographical distribution of mammography equipment and the number of mammograms performed in Brazil. Methods: This ecological study evaluated the availability of mammography machines within the SUS, those available for Brazil as a whole, its macroregions, states and the Federal District in 2016. The number of mammography machines required for breast cancer screening was calculated and compared to the number of machines available. The expected number of mammograms was compared with the actual number performed. Machines were georeferenced based on their location and the municipal seat, according to healthcare region, with 60 km being defined as the maximum distance for an individual to travel for a mammogram. Results: In 2016, there were 4,628 mammography machines in Brazil. Of these, 4,492 were in use and 2,113 (47%) were available to the SUS. Considering the number of mammograms required as a function of the number clinically indicated, 2,068 machines would be required for breast cancer screening in Brazil. The network of machines available would be capable of producing 14,279,654 exams; however, only 4,073,079 exams were performed, representing 29% of the total capacity of production in the country in 2016. Regarding the maximum distance of 60 km to access a mammogram, only relatively small areas of Brazil were found not to meet this indicator. Conclusion: These results suggest that the difficulty of the Brazilian population in accessing breast cancer screening through the SUS is not associated with the number of machines available or with the geographical location of the equipment but rather with the insufficient number of mammograms performed.

Keywords: diagnostic screening programs; mammography; national health programs; universal health insurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of Mammography Machines According to Health Regions in the States and in the Federal District: Brazil, 2016
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison between the Number of Mammograms Performed and the Total Capacity of the Mammography Machines Available to the Brazilian National Health Service (SUS) per state and the Federal District: Brazil, 2016
Figure 3
Figure 3
Linear Regression Analysis of the Female Population of 50 to 69 Years of Age and the Number of Mammography Machines According to Health Region: Brazil, 2016
Figure 4
Figure 4
Spatial Coverage Provided by the Network of Mammography Machines Available to the Brazilian National Health Service (SUS), and Environmental Conservation Areas, Military Zones and Land Inhabited by Indigenous Peoples According to Health Regions: Brazil, 2016
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage of the Female Population of 50 to 69 Years of Age Living within 60 Kilometers of a Mammography Machine Available to the Brazilian National Health Service (SUS) per State and the Federal District: Brazil, 2016
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Barros MB. Social inequality in health: revisiting moments and trends in 50 years of publication of RSP. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Collaborators Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1784–92. - PubMed
    1. Biller-Andorno N, Jüni P. Abolishing mammography screening programs? A view from the Swiss Medical Board. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1965–7. - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. Coldman A, Phillips N, Wilson C, et al. Pan-Canadian study of mammography screening and mortality from breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;106 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju261. - PubMed

MeSH terms