A Review of Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- PMID: 31244654
- PMCID: PMC6562221
- DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00609
A Review of Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitor for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as positive modulators of immune response have revolutionized the treatment of cancer and have achieved impressive efficacy in melanoma and numerous solid tumor malignancies. These agents are being investigated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to further enhance response rate as induction therapy and to improve relapse-free survival (RFS) post chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. PD-1 and CTLA-4 are the two most actively investigated checkpoint receptors, which play a role in different stages of anti-tumor immune response. This study reviews data from ongoing phase I, II clinical trials evaluating PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors on AML patients and discusses especially efficacy and adverse events as well as prospects of these drugs in treating AML. Single anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody infusion shows rather modest clinical efficacy. While combinations of PD-1 inhibitor with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) represent encouraging outcome for relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients as well as for elderly patients as first-line therapy option. Adding PD-1 inhibitor to traditional induction therapy regimen is also safe and feasible. CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab exhibits specific potency in treating relapsed AML patients with extramedullary disease in later post-transplantation stage. In terms of side effects, irAEs found in these trials can mostly be appropriately managed with steroids but are occasionally fatal. More rationally designed combinational therapies are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials and will further advance our understanding of checkpoint inhibitors as well as lead us to the most appropriate application of these agents.
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia; checkpoint inhibitor; efficacy; immunotherapy; safety.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The emerging role of immune checkpoint based approaches in AML and MDS.Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Apr;59(4):790-802. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1344905. Epub 2017 Jul 6. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018. PMID: 28679300 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis.Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 21;12:882531. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882531. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35530329 Free PMC article.
-
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Novel Combinations and Therapeutic Targets.Curr Oncol Rep. 2019 Mar 23;21(4):37. doi: 10.1007/s11912-019-0781-7. Curr Oncol Rep. 2019. PMID: 30904967 Review.
-
A phase 1b/2 study of azacitidine with PD-L1 antibody avelumab in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer. 2021 Oct 15;127(20):3761-3771. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33690. Epub 2021 Jun 25. Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34171128 Clinical Trial.
-
Checkpoint inhibition in pediatric hematologic malignancies.Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017 Sep-Oct;34(6-7):379-394. doi: 10.1080/08880018.2017.1383542. Epub 2017 Nov 30. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 29190182 Review.
Cited by
-
B7-H3, a checkpoint molecule, as a target for cancer immunotherapy.Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 25;16(11):1767-1773. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.41105. eCollection 2020. Int J Biol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32398947 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The clinical regimens and cell membrane camouflaged nanodrug delivery systems in hematologic malignancies treatment.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 16;15:1376955. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1376955. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38689664 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cytokine-induced killer cells: new insights for therapy of hematologic malignancies.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024 Aug 13;15(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13287-024-03869-z. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024. PMID: 39135188 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression Level and Prognostic Significance in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2022 Jul;38(3):464-472. doi: 10.1007/s12288-021-01473-2. Epub 2021 Jul 27. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2022. PMID: 35747564 Free PMC article.
-
A review of common immunotherapy and nano immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia.Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 10;16:1505247. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1505247. eCollection 2025. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40129984 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Assi R., Kantarjian H. M., Daver N. G., Garcia-Manero G., Benton C. B., Thompson P. A. (2018). Results of a Phase 2, open-label study of idarubicin (I), cytarabine (A) and nivolumab (Nivo) in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Blood 132 (Suppl 1), 905. 10.1002/cncr.31398 - DOI
-
- Berger R., Rotem-Yehudar R., Slama G., Landes S., Kneller A., Leiba M., et al. (2008). Phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study of CT-011, a humanized antibody interacting with PD-1, in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 14 (10), 3044–3051. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4079 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blazar B. R., Taylor P. A., Panoskaltsis-Mortari A., Sharpe A. H., Vallera D. A. (1999). Opposing roles of CD28:B7 and CTLA-4:B7 pathways in regulating in vivo alloresponses in murine recipients of MHC disparate T cells. J. Immunol. 162 (11), 6368–6377. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources