Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 12;11(4):e4447.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.4447.

Validation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 for the Arabian Patient Population

Mohammed Asiri  1 , Ghassan Alokby  2
Affiliations

Validation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 for the Arabian Patient Population

Mohammed Asiri et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background and objective Quality of life measurement is an essential element of healthcare evaluation. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) has been validated in different languages, and in this study we validated the SNOT-22 in Arabic language. The objective of this study is to provide a validated, cross-culturally adapted version of the SNOT-22 for the Arabic speaking population. Materials, methods, and main outcome measures This was a prospective cohort study set in a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The SNOT-22 was translated into Arabic by two native Arabic speakers. A total of 30 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with/without nasal polyps were included in test-retest study. Following that, a prospective study was conducted where the translated SNOT-22 was distributed to a different set of 30 CRS patients before and three months after endoscopic sinus surgery. Another 50 healthy individuals were included as a control group. The main outcome measure was the translation and validation of the SNOT-22 in Arabic. Results Internal consistency was assessed by performing a test-retest study. Cronbach's alpha was 0.803 at both the initial examination and at the retest, showing good internal consistency. There was a statistically significant difference between the results of the control group and the preoperative results of the CRS group (p<.001). The preoperative mean (SD) SNOT-22 score for the CRS group was 64.8 (20.3) and it dropped to 29.2 (11.8) postoperatively showing statistically significant change (p<.001), indicating the responsiveness of the SNOT-22. Conclusion The Arabic version of the SNOT-22 has internal consistency, reliability, and reproducibility that is needed for it to be a valid instrument to be used in research and clinical practice.

Keywords: arabic; chronic rhinosinusitis; crs; quality of life; sinonasal outcome test; sinus surgery; sinusitis; snot; snot-22; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The SNOT-22 in English
Figure 2
Figure 2. Arabic version of the SNOT-22
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, et al. Rhinology. 2012;50:1–12. - PubMed
    1. Translation cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT)-22 for Lithuanian patients. Vaitkus S, Padervinskis E, Balsevicius T, et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:1843–1848. - PubMed
    1. Quality of life in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Rudmik L, Smith TL. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011;11:247–252. - PubMed
    1. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG, Jr Richards ML. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126:41–47. - PubMed
    1. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT): can we make it more clinically meaningful? Browne JP, Hopkins C, Slack R, Cano SJ. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:736–741. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources