Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Sep 20:5:72-78.
doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2016.08.004. eCollection 2016 Dec.

Clinical experience of full custom-made artificial bones for the maxillofacial region

Affiliations

Clinical experience of full custom-made artificial bones for the maxillofacial region

Hideto Saijo et al. Regen Ther. .

Abstract

Introduction: Autologous, allogeneic, and artificial bones are clinically applied as graft materials for bone reconstruction, with each having their own advantages and disadvantages. Although artificial bones with various shapes are currently available, a product with a morphology that may be freely modified by operators has not yet been developed. In the present study, we developed a full custom-made artificial bone, and applied it to form the maxillofacial region. We herein report treatment outcomes.

Methods: An artificial bone was prepared on a 3-dimensional solid model, and data of its shape was collected on CT. A full custom-made artificial bone was prepared by laminating α-tricalcium phosphate powder using an aqueous polysaccharide curing solution and the ink-jet powder-laminating device, Z406 3D Printer (DICO, USA). Subjects comprised patients who underwent maxillofacial plasty using this artificial bone between March 2006 and September 2009.

Results: Maxillofacial plasty using the full custom-made artificial bone was applied to 23 regions in 20 patients (14 females and 6 males). The recipient region was the maxilla in 3, mandibular ramus in 13, mental region in 7, and frontal bone in 1. Postoperative courses were favorable in 18 out of the 23 regions; however, the fit was insufficient in 2 regions and the recipient regions were exposed within 1 year after surgery. Three regions were exposed 1 year or more after surgery.

Conclusion: We developed a novel reconstruction method using a full custom-made artificial bone. Its fit with the recipient bone was considered to be important, since an ill fit between the recipient and artificial bones potentially resulting in the artificial bone being detached. Therefore, fixation is important in order to prevent the detachment, and careful course observations are required when an ill fit is concerned during the follow-up period.

Keywords: Artificial bones; Complication; Full custom-made; Oral-maxillofacial region.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) An artificial bone with a planned shape was simulated by applying contrast medium-containing wax to the 3-dimensional solid plaster model. (B) The simulated model was imaged using helical CT. (C) CAD data was extracted from the DICOM data of CT.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) CAD data of an artificial bone. (B) CAD data of an artificial bone was output by a 3-dimensional printer. (C) A fabricated artificial bone.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(A) Preoperative frontal view. A concave deformity was noted in the left mandibular body. (B) Preoperative 3-dimensional CT.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(A) Intraoperative findings. The artificial bone was fixed to the recipient bone with absorbable sutures. (B) Postoperative 3-dimensional CT.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Outcomes 2 years after surgery. (A) Facial photograph. (B) 3-dimensional CT.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mental plasty case. (A) Retrogression of the mental region was observed in a preoperative photograph of the lateral face. (B) Cephalometric radiography (lateral view).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Intraoperative photograph. (A) The artificial bone was fixed to the recipient bone with absorbable sutures. (B) Postoperative cephalometric radiogram.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
(A) Facial outcomes at 8 years after surgery. (B) 3-dimensional CT.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
(A) Facial outcomes at 5 years after surgery. (B) CT. The arrow indicates grafted artificial bones. The fit of the left artificial bone was not as favorable as that on the right side; however, no abnormal finding was noted in the skin or oral cavity.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
(A) A fistula appeared in the skin at 5 years and 11 months after surgery. (B) CT showed that the artificial bone had completely detached from the recipient bone (arrow).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tessier P., Kawamoto H., Matthews D., Posnick J., Raulo Y., Tulasne J.F. Autogenous bone grafts and bone substitutes – tools and techniques: I. A 20,000-case experience in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:6S–24S. - PubMed
    1. Eppley B.L., Pietrzak W.S., Blanton M.W. Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon. J Craniofac Surg. 2005;16:981–989. - PubMed
    1. Fischer-Brandies E., Dielert E. Clinical use of tricalciumphosphate and hydroxyapatite in maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Implantol. 1985;12:40–44. - PubMed
    1. Nishiyama T., Nakajima T., Yoshimura Y., Nakanishi Y. Utilizing solid model for preoperative shaping of HAP-TCP ceramic bone substitute: application for craniomaxillofacial surgery. Eur J Plast Surg. 1994;17:173–177.
    1. Eppley B.L. Craniofacial reconstruction with computer-generated HTR patient-matched implants use in primary bone tumor excision. J Craniofac Surg. 2002;13:650–657. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources