Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 6;1(2):e10021.
doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10021. eCollection 2017 Apr.

The implications and impact of 3 approaches to health information exchange: community, enterprise, and vendor-mediated health information exchange

Affiliations

The implications and impact of 3 approaches to health information exchange: community, enterprise, and vendor-mediated health information exchange

Jordan Everson. Learn Health Syst. .

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic health information exchange (HIE) is considered essential to establishing a learning health system, reducing medical errors, and improving efficiency, but establishment of widespread, high functioning HIE has been challenging. Healthcare organizations now have considerable flexibility in selecting among several HIE strategies, most prominently community HIE, enterprise HIE (led by a healthcare organization), and electronic health record vendor-mediated HIE. Each of these strategies is characterized by different conveners, capabilities, and motivations and may have different abilities to facilitate improved patient care.

Methods: I reviewed the available scholarly literature to draw conceptual distinctions between these types of HIE, to assess the current evidence on each type of HIE, and to indicate important areas of future research.

Results: While community HIE seems to offer the most open approach to HIE allowing for high levels of connectivity, both enterprise HIE and vendor-mediated HIE face lower barriers to formation and sustainability. Most existing evidence is focused on community HIE and points towards low overall use, challenges to usability, and ambiguous impact. To better guide organizational leaders and policymakers in the expansion of beneficial HIE and anticipate future trends, future research should work to better capture the prevalence of other forms of HIE, and to adopt common methods to allow comparisons of rate of use, usability, and impact on patient care across studies and types of HIE.

Conclusions: Healthcare organizations' choice of HIE strategy influences the set of partners the organization is connected to and may influence the benefit that efforts supported by HIE can offer to patients. Current research is not fully capturing the diversity of approaches to HIE and their potentially varying impact on providers and patients.

Keywords: Electronic Health Record; Health Information Exchange; Health Information Technology; Quality of Care; Review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rubin RD. The community health information movement: Where it's been, where it's going: Springer; 2003.
    1. Adler‐Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK. Operational health information exchanges show substantial growth, but long‐term funding remains a concern. Health Aff. 2013;32(8):1486–1492. - PubMed
    1. Furukawa MF, King J, Patel V, Hsiao C‐J, Adler‐Milstein J, Jha AK. Despite substantial progress in EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings. Health Aff. 2014;33(9):1672–1679. - PubMed
    1. Miller RH, Miller BS. The Santa Barbara County care data exchange: What happened? Health Aff. 2007;26(5):w568–ww80. - PubMed
    1. Kern LM, Barron Y, Abramson EL, Patel V, Kaushal R. HEAL NY: Promoting interoperable health information technology in New York state. Health Aff. 2009;28(2):493–504. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources