Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 19;19(12):2745.
doi: 10.3390/s19122745.

Slice Management for Quality of Service Differentiation in Wireless Network Slicing

Affiliations

Slice Management for Quality of Service Differentiation in Wireless Network Slicing

Namwon An et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Network slicing is a technology that virtualizes a single infrastructure into multiple logical networks (called slices) where resources or virtualized functions can be flexibly configured by demands of applications to satisfy their quality of service (QoS) requirements. Generally, to provide the guaranteed QoS in applications, resources of slices are isolated. In wired networks, this resource isolation is enabled by allocating dedicated data bandwidths to slices. However, in wireless networks, resource isolation may be challenging because the interference between links affects the actual bandwidths of slices and degrades their QoS. In this paper, we propose a slice management scheme that mitigates the interference imposed on each slice according to their priorities by determining routes of flows with a different routing policy. Traffic flows in the slice with the highest priority are routed into shortest paths. In each lower-priority slice, the routing of traffic flows is conducted while minimizing a weighted summation of interference to other slices. Since higher-priority slices have higher interference weights, they receive lower interference from other slices. As a result, the QoS of slices is differentiated according to their priorities while the interference imposed on slices is reduced. We compared the proposed slice management scheme with a naïve slice management (NSM) method that differentiates QoS among slices by priority queuing. We conducted some simulations and the simulation results show that our proposed management scheme not only differentiates the QoS of slices according to their priorities but also enhances the average throughput and delay performance of slices remarkably compared to that of the NSM method. The simulations were conducted in grid network topologies with 16 and 100 nodes and a random network topology with 200 nodes. Simulation results indicate that the proposed slice management increased the average throughput of slices up to 6%, 13%, and 7% and reduced the average delay of slices up to 14%, 15%, and 11% in comparison with the NSM method.

Keywords: interference; isolation; multiple routing; network slicing; priority; software-defined networking; wireless network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A system model of slicing-enabled wireless software-defined networks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
An example of prioritized multiple routing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Acceptance ratio of the low-priority slice by the interference threshold of the high-priority slice (Γ1).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Throughput and delay by the interference threshold of the high-priority slice (Γ1).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Throughput and delay with respect to different numbers of flows.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Acceptance ratio with respect to different numbers of flows.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Throughput and delay across different numbers of slices in a grid topology (number of total flows = 30, Γ=).
Figure 8
Figure 8
A random topology of 200 nodes.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Throughput and delay according to a number of slices in a random topology (number of total flows = 40, Γ=).

References

    1. NGMN 5G White Paper. [(accessed on 18 June 2019)]; Available online: http://www.ngmn.org/fileadmin/ngmn/content/images/news/ngmn_news/NGMN_5G....
    1. View on 5G Architecture. [(accessed on 18 June 2019)]; Available online: http://5g-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/5G-PPP-5G-Architecture-WP-Ju....
    1. Duan Q., Ansari N., Toy M. Software-defined network virtualization: An architectural framework for integrating SDN and NFV for service provisioning in future networks. IEEE Netw. 2016;30:10–16. doi: 10.1109/MNET.2016.7579021. - DOI
    1. Lee Y.L., Loo J., Chuah T.C., Wang L.C. Dynamic network slicing for multitenant heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2018;17:2146–2161. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2017.2789294. - DOI
    1. Bega D., Gramaglia M., Banchs A., Sciancalepore V., Samdanis K., Costa-Perez X. Optimising 5G infrastructure markets: The business of network slicing; Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM; Atlanta, GA, USA. 1–4 May 2017; pp. 1–9.