Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 19;16(12):2173.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122173.

Cyberbullying in Gifted Students: Prevalence and Psychological Well-Being in a Spanish Sample

Affiliations

Cyberbullying in Gifted Students: Prevalence and Psychological Well-Being in a Spanish Sample

Joaquín González-Cabrera et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The differential characteristics of gifted students can make them vulnerable to cyberbullying. There is very little empirical evidence about cyberbullying and giftedness. In the Spanish context, it is unexplored. The main goal of this work is to determine the prevalence of cyberbullying, its distribution in the different roles, and its relationship with other psychological variables. A cross-sectional study was performed with 255 gifted students (M = 11.88 years, SD = 2.28 years) in Spain (155 males, 60.8%). We used the cyberbullying test and the Spanish versions of the DASS-21, ISEL, KIDSCREEN-10, and the SWLS. The results indicate that 25.1% of the students are pure-cybervictims, 3.9% pure-cyberbullies, and 6.6% cyberbully-victims. Pure-cybervictims and cyberbully-victims present worse scores (p < 0.001) in health-related quality of life, depression, life satisfaction and stress than the uninvolved individuals. The results suggest that the gifted sample presents more cybervictimization and less cyberbullying than observed in other studies of the general population.

Keywords: anxiety; cyberbullying; depression; gifted; health-related quality of life; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hinduja S., Patchin J.W. Bullying Beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying. SAGE Publications Sage (Corwin Press); Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: 2009.
    1. Tokunaga R.S. Following You Home from School: A Critical Review and Synthesis of Research on Cyberbullying Victimization. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2010;26:277–287. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014. - DOI
    1. González-Cabrera J.M., León-Mejía A., Machimbarrena J.M., Balea A., Calvete E. Psychometric properties of the cyberbullying triangulation questionnaire: A prevalence analysis through seven roles. Scand. J. Psychol. 2019;60:160–168. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12518. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Organization W.H. Growing Up Unequal: Gender and Socioeconomic Differences in Young People’s Health and Well-Being. WHO Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2016.
    1. Garaigordobil M. Cyberbullying. Screening de Acoso Entre Iguales [Cyberbullying. Screening of Peer Harassment] TEA; Madrid, Spain: 2013.

Publication types