Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 16;116(29):14538-14546.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817588116. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

Ingroup vigilance in collectivistic cultures

Shi S Liu  1 , Michael W Morris  2 , Thomas Talhelm  3 , Qian Yang  4
Affiliations

Ingroup vigilance in collectivistic cultures

Shi S Liu et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Collectivistic cultures have been characterized as having harmonious, cooperative ingroup relationships. However, we find evidence that people in collectivistic cultures are more vigilant toward ingroup members, mindful of their possible unethical intentions. Study 1 found that Chinese participants were more vigilant than Americans in within-group competitions, anticipating more unethical behaviors from their peers. Study 2 replicated this finding by comparing areas within China, finding that people from China's collectivistic rice-farming regions exhibit greater ingroup vigilance than people from the less collectivistic wheat-farming regions. The rice/wheat difference was mediated by greater perceived within-group competition. Study 3 found that Chinese participants were more likely than Americans to interpret a peer's friendly behavior as sabotage in disguise. We also manipulated within-group competition and found that it increased ingroup vigilance in both cultures. Finally, study 3 identified two boundary conditions where cultural differences in ingroup vigilance decrease: an unambiguously competitive win-lose situation where Americans also exhibit vigilance, and an unambiguously cooperative win-win situation where Chinese participants relax their vigilance. This research contributes to a more balanced view of collectivism, revealing its interpersonal tensions in the forms of within-group competition and ingroup vigilance.

Keywords: collectivism; competition; culture; interpersonal relationships; social cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Ingroup vigilance by culture (study 1).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Ingroup vigilance by rice cultivation (study 2). The regression line and HLM analysis control for SES (Table 1, model 2).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Study 2 mediation model. Values are standardized regression coefficients. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Ingroup vigilance by culture and competition (study 3). Error bars represent 1 SE.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Milner R., et al., Eds. Lonely Planet Japan (Lonely Planet Global, Melbourne, Australia, 2017).
    1. Benedict R., The Chrysanthemum and the Sword; Patterns of Japanese Culture (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 1946).
    1. Hsu F. L., Americans and Chinese: Passages to Differences (University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, ed. 3, 1981).
    1. Triandis H. C., Bontempo R., Villareal M. J., Asai M., Lucca N., Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 323–338 (1988).
    1. Markus H. R., Kitayama S., Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991).