Nonclosure of the Peritoneum during Appendectomy May Cause Less Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study
- PMID: 31249637
- PMCID: PMC6556235
- DOI: 10.1155/2019/9392780
Nonclosure of the Peritoneum during Appendectomy May Cause Less Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study
Abstract
Objective: We aim to evaluate the effect of peritoneal closure on postoperative pain and life quality associated with open appendectomy operations.
Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, and double-blinded study. Here, 18-65-year-old patients who underwent open appendectomy for acute appendicitis were included. Demographic data of the patients, operation time, length of hospital stay, pain scores using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS) on the first postoperative day, quality of life assessment using the EuroQol-5D-5L questionnaire on postoperative 10th day, deep wound dehiscence, bowel obstruction, and mortality data were recorded.
Results: In total, 112 patients were included in the study. The demographic data showed no significant difference between the groups. The median VAS score was lower in the group with open peritoneum, but this difference was not statistically significant (3 vs. 4, p=0.134). The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the peritoneal nonclosure group (31.0 ± 15.1 vs. 38.5 ± 17.5 minutes, p=0.016). Overall complication rates and life quality test (EuroQol-5D-5L) results were similar between groups.
Conclusion: Nonclosure of the peritoneum seems to shorten the duration of surgery without increasing complications during open appendectomy. Postoperative pain and life quality measures were not affected by nonclosure of the peritoneum. This trial is registered with NCT02803463.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy in uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 May;19(3):200-4. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.58234. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013. PMID: 23720105 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study.Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016 Jul-Sept.;14(55):244-248. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016. PMID: 28814687
-
Closure or nonclosure of the peritoneum at gynecological operations. Effect on postoperative pain.Saudi Med J. 2005 Jun;26(6):964-8. Saudi Med J. 2005. PMID: 15983684 Clinical Trial.
-
Is laparoscopic appendectomy the new 'gold standard'?Arch Surg. 1995 Jul;130(7):782-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430070104022. Arch Surg. 1995. PMID: 7611871 Review.
-
[Is open appendectomy still up-to-date?].Ther Umsch. 2005 Feb;62(2):111-7. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.62.2.111. Ther Umsch. 2005. PMID: 15756921 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Perioperative factors influencing post-appendectomy outcomes in adults: a single-center prospective study in the North of Palestine.BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03007-3. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40616063 Free PMC article.
-
No closure of the linea alba cervicalis reduces complications in endoscopic thyroidectomy.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 7;15(1):4577. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88873-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39920252 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cipe G., Idiz O., Hasbahceci M., et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: where are we now? Chirurgia (Bucur) 2014;109(4):518–522. - PubMed
-
- Kurek Eken M., Örek E., Tarhan T., et al. Effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: does it have any effect on postoperative vital signs? A prospective randomized study. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2017;30(8):922–926. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1190826. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical