Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment
- PMID: 31249961
- PMCID: PMC6524899
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673389
Safety of Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel after Prehospital Initiation of Treatment
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this registry was to study the safety of prehospital initiation of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Background Ticagrelor has replaced clopidogrel in many hospitals as the routinely used antiplatelet drug in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Nevertheless, in the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial, ticagrelor was associated with an increase in non-CABG (non-coronary artery bypass grafting)-related major bleeding. Data comparing the safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment are not available. Methods A retrospective, multicenter registry was performed. Selection criteria were the administration of a prehospital loading dose of ticagrelor or clopidogrel according to the ambulance STEMI treatment protocol and the presentation to a percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospital in our region between January 2011 and December 2012. Follow-up was performed using the electronic patient files for the time period between the antiplatelet loading dose and hospital discharge. The data were analyzed using a primary bleeding end point (any bleeding) and a secondary thrombotic end point (all-cause mortality, spontaneous myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or transient ischemic attack). Results Data of 304 clopidogrel-treated and 309 ticagrelor-treated patients were available for analysis. No significant difference in bleeding rate was observed between both groups, using univariate (17.8 vs. 20.1%; p = 0.47; odds ratio, 1.16 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.74]) and multivariate ( p = 0.42) analysis. Also for the secondary thrombotic end point (6.3 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.45), no significant differences were observed. Conclusion In this real-world registry, no significant differences in bleeding or thrombotic event rate were found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel after prehospital initiation of treatment.
Keywords: clopidogrel; hemorrhage; myocardial infarction; prehospital emergency care; ticagrelor.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. G. Montalescot reports research Grants to the Institution or Consulting/Lecture Fees from Acuitude, ADIR, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Berlin Chimie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Brigham Women's Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Celladon, CME resources, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, Europa, Fédération Française de Cardiologie, Gilead, Hopitaux Universitaires Genève, ICAN, Janssen-Cilag, Lead-Up, Medcon International, Menarini, Medtronic, MSD, Pfizer, Recor, Sanofi-Aventis, Stentys, The Medicines Company, TIMI Study Group, Universitat Basel, WebMD, and Zoll Medical.
All other authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures


References
-
- Davì G, Patrono C. Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(24):2482–2494. - PubMed
-
- Ruggeri Z M. Platelets in atherothrombosis. Nat Med. 2002;8(11):1227–1234. - PubMed
-
- Vlaar P J, Svilaas T, Damman K et al.Impact of pretreatment with clopidogrel on initial patency and outcome in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review. Circulation. 2008;118(18):1828–1836. - PubMed
-
- Mehta S R, Yusuf S, Peters R Jet al.Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study Lancet 2001358(9281):527–533. - PubMed
-
- Sabatine M S, Cannon C P, Gibson C M et al.Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(12):1179–1189. - PubMed