Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;33(8):1106-1113.
doi: 10.1177/0269216319857628. Epub 2019 Jun 28.

Robotic technology for palliative and supportive care: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

Amara Callistus Nwosu  1   2   3 , Bethany Sturgeon  4 , Tamsin McGlinchey  2 , Christian Dg Goodwin  2   5 , Ardhendu Behera  6 , Stephen Mason  2 , Sarah Stanley  3 , Terry R Payne  7
Affiliations

Robotic technology for palliative and supportive care: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats

Amara Callistus Nwosu et al. Palliat Med. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Medical robots are increasingly used for a variety of applications in healthcare. Robots have mainly been used to support surgical procedures, and for a variety of assistive uses in dementia and elderly care. To date, there has been limited debate about the potential opportunities and risks of robotics in other areas of palliative, supportive and end-of-life care.

Aim: The objective of this article is to examine the possible future impact of medical robotics on palliative, supportive care and end-of-life care. Specifically, we will discuss the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of this technology.

Methods: A SWOT analysis to understand the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of robotic technology in palliative and supportive care.

Results: The opportunities of robotics in palliative, supportive and end-of-life care include a number of assistive, therapeutic, social and educational uses. However, there are a number of technical, societal, economic and ethical factors which need to be considered to ensure meaningful use of this technology in palliative care.

Conclusion: Robotics could have a number of potential applications in palliative, supportive and end-of-life care. Future work should evaluate the health-related, economic, societal and ethical implications of using this technology. There is a need for collaborative research to establish use-cases and inform policy, to ensure the appropriate use (or non-use) of robots for people with serious illness.

Keywords: Robotics; end-of-life care; healthcare; palliative care; supportive care; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

References

    1. Beasley RA. Medical robots: current systems and research directions. J Robot 2012; 2012: 14.
    1. Ceccarelli M. Problems and issues for service robots in new applications. Int J Soc Robot 2011; 3: 299–312.
    1. Dallaway JL, Jackson RD, Timmers PH. Rehabilitation robotics in Europe. IEEE T Rehabil Eng 1995; 3: 35–45.
    1. Nwosu AC, Mason S. Palliative medicine and smartphones: an opportunity for innovation? BMJ Support Palliat Care 2012; 2(1): 75–77. - PubMed
    1. Roh HF, Nam SH, Kim JM. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2018; 13(1): e0191628. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types