Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 28;20(1):89.
doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0984-x.

Danish general practitioners have found their own way of using point-of-care ultrasonography in primary care: a qualitative study

Affiliations

Danish general practitioners have found their own way of using point-of-care ultrasonography in primary care: a qualitative study

Camilla Aakjær Andersen et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: General practitioners increasingly use point-of-care ultrasonography despite a lack of evidence-based guidelines for their appropriate use in primary care. Little is known about the integration of ultrasonography in general practice consultations and the impact of its use on patient care. The purpose of this study was to explore general practitioners' experiences of using ultrasonography in the primary care setting.

Methods: Adopting an explorative phenomenological approach, we performed semi-structured interviews with general practitioners who used ultrasonography in their daily work. Thirteen general practitioners were recruited stepwise, aiming for maximum variation in background characteristics. Interviews were conducted at the general practitioner's own clinic. Transcription and systematic text condensation analysis began immediately after conducting each interview.

Results: The general practitioners described using ultrasonography for both selected focused examinations and for explorative examinations. The two types of examinations were described differently for each of the following emerging themes: motivation for using ultrasonography, ultrasonography as part of the consultation, selection of an ultrasound catalogue, and consequences of the general practitioner's ultrasound examination. The general practitioners had chosen and integrated their own individual ultrasound catalogue of focused examinations as a natural part of their consultations. The focused examinations were used to answer simple clinical questions and they had a significant impact on the patients' diagnoses, clinical pathways and treatments. The general practitioners considered their own catalogue of focused examinations as their comfort zone. However, they also performed explorative ultrasound examinations outside their catalogue. These scans were performed to train, gain or maintain ultrasound competences or as explorative examinations driven by curiosity. The explorative ultrasound examinations rarely had an impact on patient care.

Conclusions: This study describes how general practitioners found their own way of using ultrasonography in general practice and selected a personal catalogue of ultrasound examinations that was applicable, relevant and meaningful for their daily clinical routines. This study may serve to inform implementation strategies in general practice by offering insights into central aspects that drive general practitioners' behaviours.

Keywords: Family medicine; General practice; Implementation; Interviews; Point-of-care ultrasound; Primary care; Qualitative methods; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Systematic text condensation in this study. This figure illustrates and elaborates the analytic process in this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Two ways of using ultrasonography. This figure illustrates the interaction between themes in the analysis and the distinction between selected focused ultrasound examinations and explorative ultrasound examinations within each theme

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Moore CLCJ. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(8):749–757. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0909487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weile J, Brix J, Moellekaer AB. Is point-of-care ultrasound disruptive innovation? Formulating why POCUS is different from conventional comprehensive ultrasound. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018;10(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13089-018-0106-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laursen CB, Sloth E, Lassen AT, Rd C, Lambrechtsen J, Madsen PH, et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography in patients admitted with respiratory symptoms: a single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Resp Med. 2014;2(8):638–646. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70135-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smallwood Nicholas, Dachsel Martin. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): unnecessary gadgetry or evidence-based medicine? Clinical Medicine. 2018;18(3):219–224. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-3-219. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bornemann P, Jayasekera N, Bergman K, Ramos M, Gerhart J. Point-of-care ultrasound: coming soon to primary care? J Fam Pract. 2018;67(2):70–80. - PubMed

Publication types