Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan;30(1):38-45.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04039-4.

The Effect of the Intra-gastric Balloon on Gastric Emptying and the DeMeester Score

Affiliations

The Effect of the Intra-gastric Balloon on Gastric Emptying and the DeMeester Score

Sergio Barrichello et al. Obes Surg. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Background and aims: The mechanism of weight loss with the intra-gastric balloon (IGB) is thought to be a decrease in gastric emptying (GE); however the evidence is conflicting. Nausea, abdominal pain, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause intolerance resulting in early removal. This is demoralizing for the patient and costly for the healthcare system. The ability to predict which patients will have superior weight loss and tolerance is invaluable. We sought to investigate if the IGB induced weight loss by reducing GE and the effect of the IGB on the DeMeester score.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data for patients undergoing IGB placement at a single hospital. Manometry and pH studies were performed before and with the IGB in place. Weight was measured at baseline, at removal, and 6 months later. Adverse events leading to early removal were recorded.

Results: Twenty-four patients were evaluated. There was a statistically significant decrease in GE for solids with the IGB (117.92 ± 150.23 vs 281.48 ± 206.49 min; p = 0.0048), but not for liquids (54.44 ± 17.97 vs 56.08 ± 43.96 min; p = 0.7228). The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure did not change significantly with placement of the IGB (17.76 ± 7.39 vs 14.74 ± 7.24 mmHg; p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, increase in DeMeester score was associated with total body weight loss (p = 0.0125) and change in GE (p = 0.038) independently.

Conclusion: The IGB delays GE for solids, but not for liquids, and increases the DeMeester score by a mechanism other than a loss of LES pressure.

Keywords: DeMeester score; Endoscopic bariatric therapy; Gastric emptying; Intra-gastric balloon.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20 Suppl 2:S462-6 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2004 Apr;14(4):539-44 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 Nov;37(11):1246-52 - PubMed
    1. Int J Surg. 2018 Sep;57:22-29 - PubMed
    1. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Sep;24(9):1849-53 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources