Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Sep;72(9):1331-1338.
doi: 10.1002/acr.24019.

Patients' Views on Routine Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology Outpatient Care: A Multicenter Focus Group Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Patients' Views on Routine Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology Outpatient Care: A Multicenter Focus Group Study

Jette Primdahl et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the patients' views of the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes as part of routine care in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative focus group study based on interviews in each of the 5 geographical regions of Denmark. The analysis was based on content analysis. Four patient research partners were involved in the study.

Results: In total, 32 adult patients (21 female) with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 21), psoriatic arthritis (n = 6), and axial spondyloarthritis (n = 5) participated. The mean age was 60 years (range 32-80 years). Five themes were derived from the analysis: 1) a need for information about why the data are collected, reflecting patients' uncertainty as to whether the collection of patient-reported outcomes primarily served to monitor their own disease, to save money, or to gather data for research purposes; 2) inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in the consultation, encompassing patients' expectations of active use of the patient-reported outcomes data during talks with rheumatologists or nurses; 3) reflections on how to respond to the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to obtain high quality data, referring to patients' concerns about how to respond "correctly" and about issues that could affect their responses; 4) addressing patient-reported outcomes to the individual's challenges, reflecting the need for a more individualized approach; and 5) possibilities for improvement in the use of patient-reported outcomes, referring to patients' ideas for the future use of patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusion: Information and dialogue regarding the purpose of patient-reported outcomes collection, how to respond to PROMs correctly, and inclusion of the patient-reported outcomes data in the consultation are of importance to patients with inflammatory arthritis who routinely complete patient-reported outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Snyder CF, Aaronson NK. Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Lancet 2009;374:369-70.
    1. Richter J, Kampling C, Schneider M. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures. In: El Miedany Y, editor. Patient reported outcome measures in rheumatic diseases. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
    1. El Miedany Y. PROMs for rheumatoid arthritis. In: El Miedany Y, editor. Patient reported outcome measures in rheumatic diseases. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 101-20.
    1. Munch-Petersen M, Storm F, Svenstrup N, Hørder M, Program PRO's ekspertgruppe. PROGRAM PRO: anvendelse af PRO-data i kvalitetsudviklingen af det danske sundhedsvaesen - anbefalinger og vidensgrundlag. København Videnscenter for Brugerinddragelse i Sundhedsvaesenet 2016;978-87-996473-3-0.
    1. Black N, Burke L, Forrest CB, Sieberer UH, Ahmed S, Valderas JM, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Qual Life Res 2016;25:1103-12.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources