Patients' Views on Routine Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology Outpatient Care: A Multicenter Focus Group Study
- PMID: 31254452
- DOI: 10.1002/acr.24019
Patients' Views on Routine Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology Outpatient Care: A Multicenter Focus Group Study
Abstract
Objective: To explore the patients' views of the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes as part of routine care in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative focus group study based on interviews in each of the 5 geographical regions of Denmark. The analysis was based on content analysis. Four patient research partners were involved in the study.
Results: In total, 32 adult patients (21 female) with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 21), psoriatic arthritis (n = 6), and axial spondyloarthritis (n = 5) participated. The mean age was 60 years (range 32-80 years). Five themes were derived from the analysis: 1) a need for information about why the data are collected, reflecting patients' uncertainty as to whether the collection of patient-reported outcomes primarily served to monitor their own disease, to save money, or to gather data for research purposes; 2) inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in the consultation, encompassing patients' expectations of active use of the patient-reported outcomes data during talks with rheumatologists or nurses; 3) reflections on how to respond to the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to obtain high quality data, referring to patients' concerns about how to respond "correctly" and about issues that could affect their responses; 4) addressing patient-reported outcomes to the individual's challenges, reflecting the need for a more individualized approach; and 5) possibilities for improvement in the use of patient-reported outcomes, referring to patients' ideas for the future use of patient-reported outcomes.
Conclusion: Information and dialogue regarding the purpose of patient-reported outcomes collection, how to respond to PROMs correctly, and inclusion of the patient-reported outcomes data in the consultation are of importance to patients with inflammatory arthritis who routinely complete patient-reported outcomes.
© 2019, American College of Rheumatology.
References
-
- Snyder CF, Aaronson NK. Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Lancet 2009;374:369-70.
-
- Richter J, Kampling C, Schneider M. Electronic patient-reported outcome measures. In: El Miedany Y, editor. Patient reported outcome measures in rheumatic diseases. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
-
- El Miedany Y. PROMs for rheumatoid arthritis. In: El Miedany Y, editor. Patient reported outcome measures in rheumatic diseases. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 101-20.
-
- Munch-Petersen M, Storm F, Svenstrup N, Hørder M, Program PRO's ekspertgruppe. PROGRAM PRO: anvendelse af PRO-data i kvalitetsudviklingen af det danske sundhedsvaesen - anbefalinger og vidensgrundlag. København Videnscenter for Brugerinddragelse i Sundhedsvaesenet 2016;978-87-996473-3-0.
-
- Black N, Burke L, Forrest CB, Sieberer UH, Ahmed S, Valderas JM, et al. Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies. Qual Life Res 2016;25:1103-12.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
