Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence methods for melanoma: A retrospective review
- PMID: 31255749
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.042
Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence methods for melanoma: A retrospective review
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence methods for the classification of melanoma have been studied extensively. However, few studies compare these methods under the same standards.
Objective: To seek the best artificial intelligence method for diagnosis of melanoma.
Methods: The contrast test used 2200 dermoscopic images. Image segmentations, feature extractions, and classifications were performed in sequence for evaluation of traditional machine learning algorithms. The recent popular convolutional neural network frameworks were used for transfer learning training classification.
Results: The region growing algorithm has the best segmentation performance, with an intersection over union of 70.06% and a false-positive rate of 17.67%. Classification performance was better with logistic regression, with a sensitivity of 76.36% and a specificity of 87.04%. The Inception V3 model (Google, Mountain View, CA) worked best in deep learning algorithms: the accuracy was 93.74%, the sensitivity was 94.36%, and the specificity was 85.64%.
Limitations: There was no division in the severity of melanoma samples used in this experiment. The data set was relatively small for deep learning.
Conclusion: The performance of traditional machine learning is satisfactory for the small data set of melanoma dermoscopic images, and the potential for deep learning in the future big data era is enormous.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; classification; deep learning; melanoma diagnosis; segmentation; traditional machine learning.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Skin cancer classification via convolutional neural networks: systematic review of studies involving human experts.Eur J Cancer. 2021 Oct;156:202-216. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.049. Epub 2021 Sep 8. Eur J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34509059
-
A convolutional neural network trained with dermoscopic images performed on par with 145 dermatologists in a clinical melanoma image classification task.Eur J Cancer. 2019 Apr;111:148-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Mar 8. Eur J Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30852421
-
Deep neural networks are superior to dermatologists in melanoma image classification.Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep;119:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.05.023. Epub 2019 Aug 8. Eur J Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31401469
-
Developing a Recognition System for Diagnosing Melanoma Skin Lesions Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 May 15;2021:9998379. doi: 10.1155/2021/9998379. eCollection 2021. Comput Math Methods Med. 2021. PMID: 34055044 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in melanoma: A systematic review.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Nov;21(11):5993-6004. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15323. Epub 2022 Sep 20. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 36001057
Cited by
-
Development and validation of a predictive model combining clinical, radiomics, and deep transfer learning features for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 3;9:986437. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.986437. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36262277 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial Intelligence in Cutaneous Oncology.Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 10;7:318. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00318. eCollection 2020. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020. PMID: 32754606 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lack of Transparency and Potential Bias in Artificial Intelligence Data Sets and Algorithms: A Scoping Review.JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Nov 1;157(11):1362-1369. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3129. JAMA Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 34550305 Free PMC article.
-
Distinguish the Value of the Benign Nevus and Melanomas Using Machine Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.Mediators Inflamm. 2022 Oct 14;2022:1734327. doi: 10.1155/2022/1734327. eCollection 2022. Mediators Inflamm. 2022. PMID: 36274972 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopic Photographs Impact Confidence and Management of Remotely Triaged Skin Lesions.Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022 Jul 1;12(3):e2022129. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1203a129. eCollection 2022 Jul. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022. PMID: 36159122 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical