Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
- PMID: 31256006
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105547
Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
Abstract
In 'Moral case for legal age change', I argue that sometimes people should be allowed to change their age. I refute six immediate objections against the view that age change is permissible. I argue that the objections cannot show that legal age change should always be prohibited. In this paper, I consider some further objections against legal age change raised by Iain Brassington, Toni Saad and William Simkulet. I argue that the objections fail to show that age change should never be allowed.
Keywords: legal aspects; legal philosophy; philosophical ethics; public policy; social aspects.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment on
-
Moral case for legal age change.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):461-464. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105294. Epub 2019 Mar 14. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30872325
-
Against the nihilism of 'legal age change': response to Räsänen.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):465-466. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105475. Epub 2019 May 15. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31092633
-
What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):467-468. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105494. Epub 2019 Jun 19. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31217229
-
On legal age change.J Med Ethics. 2019 Jul;45(7):469-470. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105445. Epub 2019 Jul 13. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31302604
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources