Women's compliance with ultrasound in labor: a prospective observational study
- PMID: 31257977
- DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1638903
Women's compliance with ultrasound in labor: a prospective observational study
Abstract
Objective: To explore women's compliance with ultrasound evaluation (UE) during labor compared with standard vaginal examination (VE).
Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study including uncomplicated singleton pregnancies with the fetus in vertex presentation from 37 weeks of gestation. Labor progress was assessed by both VE and UE. Women acceptability was assessed using a modified Wijma Delivery experience questionnaire (W-DEQ) based on six different items and resulting in a score ranging from 6 (not tolerated) to 36 (well tolerated). The primary outcome of the study was to compute the differences in the overall modified W-DEQ questionnaire between UE and VE. Secondary outcomes were to assess the differences between UE and VE in each individual item of modified W-DEQ questionnaire and to elucidate whether such differences persist in pregnancies experiencing compared to those not experiencing prolonged labor or unplanned emergency operative delivery.
Results: One hundred and twenty-four women were included in the study and 109 completed the full questionnaire. The overall global acceptability score was significantly higher for UE compared to VE (27 IQR 25-29 versus 18 IQR 16-22; p ≤ .001). When stratifying the analysis to each individual item of the W-DEQ questionnaire separately, significant differences for intrusiveness (p = .04); painful (p = .01) and privacy ensured (p = .01) were found between UE and VE. In pregnancies experiencing prolonged labor, the global W-DEQ acceptability score for UE resulted significantly higher (30 versus 23; p = .005) than in those delivering within 12 hours. Likewise, UE acceptability score was significantly higher (28 IQR 24-30 versus 22 IQR 20-25; p = .01) in women having spontaneous vaginal birth compared to those undergoing operative delivery. Finally, there was no difference in the acceptability score between women with spontaneous onset of labor compared to those undergoing elective induction.
Conclusions: UE is better tolerated VE for assessment of labor progress; women's compliance with UE prior to delivery increased in the presence of prolonged labor or unplanned operative delivery.
Keywords: Intrapartum ultrasound; labor; translabial ultrasoundm digital examination; women anxiety.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound is better tolerated than vaginal examination in and before labour.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jun;59(3):362-366. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12864. Epub 2018 Jul 19. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019. PMID: 30024022
-
Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):335.e1-335.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.040. Epub 2019 May 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31153931
-
Acceptability of intrapartum ultrasound by mothers in an African population.J Ultrasound. 2020 Mar;23(1):55-59. doi: 10.1007/s40477-019-00382-5. Epub 2019 May 8. J Ultrasound. 2020. PMID: 31069758 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2):205-214.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.031. Epub 2021 Aug 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34384775
-
Ultrasound in labor and delivery.Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(2):61-7. doi: 10.1159/000287588. Epub 2010 Feb 18. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010. PMID: 20173318 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasound before instrumental vaginal delivery: A useful tool to avoid misdiagnosis of fetal head position.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Nov;101(11):1342-1343. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14463. Epub 2022 Sep 21. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022. PMID: 36129096 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Oct 12;20:100246. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246. eCollection 2023 Dec. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023. PMID: 37876768 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound: angle of progression to evaluate and predict the mode of delivery and labor progression.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024 Jan;67(1):1-16. doi: 10.5468/ogs.23141. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38029738 Free PMC article.
-
Routine vaginal examinations compared to other methods for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 4;3(3):CD010088. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010088.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35244935 Free PMC article.
-
How to Reach the Best Ultrasound Performance in the Delivery Room.Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;44(11):1070-1077. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759773. Epub 2022 Dec 29. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 36580951 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical