Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;39(5):605-616.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X19841587. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries?

Bram Roudijk  1 , A Rogier T Donders  1 , Peep F M Stalmeier  1 ; Cultural Values Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Cultural Values: Can They Explain Differences in Health Utilities between Countries?

Bram Roudijk et al. Med Decis Making. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction. Health utilities are widely used in health care. The distributions of utilities differ between countries; some countries more often report worse than dead health states, while mild states are valued more or less the same. We hypothesize that cultural values explain these country-related utility differences. Research Question. What is the effect of sociodemographic background, methodological factors, and cultural values on differences in health utilities? Methods and Analyses. Time tradeoff data from 28 EQ-5D valuation studies were analyzed, together with their sociodemographic variables. The dependent variable was Δu, the utility difference between mild and severe states. Country-specific cultural variables were taken from the World Values Survey. Multilevel models were used to analyze the effect of sociodemographic background, methodology (3L v. 5L), and cultural values on Δu. Intraclass correlation (ICC) for country variation was used to assess the impact of the predicting variables on the variation between countries. Results. Substantial variation in Δu was found between countries. Adding cultural values did not reduce ICCs for country variation. Sociodemographic background variables were only weakly associated with Δu and did not affect the ICC. Δu was 0.118 smaller for EQ-5D-5L studies. Discussion.Δu varies between countries. These differences were not explained by national cultural values. In conclusion, despite correction for various variables, utility differences between countries remain substantial and unexplained. This justifies the use of country-specific value sets for instruments such as the EQ-5D.

Keywords: EQ-5D; cultural values; health utilities; multilevel modelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scores on the 2 cultural dimensions, by country.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dotplot of average Δu scores by country.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Froberg DG, Kane RL. Methodology for measuring health-state preferences –I: Measurement strategies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1989;42(4):345–54. - PubMed
    1. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92. - PubMed
    1. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. A social tariff for EuroQol: results from a UK general population survey. York, the United Kingdom: 1995.
    1. Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system: Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34(7):702–22. - PubMed
    1. Norman R, et al. International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1194–200. - PubMed

Publication types