Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul-Sep;24(3):176-179.
doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_47_18.

Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Neonates

Jenisha Chaudhary  1 , B Shivprasad  1 , V Lakshmi  1 , R Shanmughsundaram  1 , G Nandhini  2 , P Balamourougane  2
Affiliations

Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in Neonates

Jenisha Chaudhary et al. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Aim: The aim is to study the demographic characteristics of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to analyze the prognostic factors determining mortality.

Settings and design: A retrospective cohort of CDH admitted at a tertiary level hospital during January 2005-December 2017.

Materials and methods: All cases of CDH admitted to our tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit before undergoing surgery were included in the study. Babies admitted after surgery and those with eventration of the diaphragm were excluded from the study.

Results: Thirty cases (66.66% males, 53.33% inborn, and 63.3% >37 weeks) formed the study cohort. Mean birth weight was 2762 ± 579.67 g and mean gestational age was 37.12 ± 1.76 weeks. About 56.66% of the cases were detected antenatally. The survival rate was 60%. Predictors of poor survival included herniation of the liver or stomach (P < 0.05), low Apgar score at 5 min (<5), presence of moderate-to-severe persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) (P < 0.001), presence of shock (P < 0.003), low partial pressure of oxygen, high alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, and high oxygenation index during first 24 h.

Conclusions: Majority of the neonates with CDH at our center were >37 weeks and survival was 60%. The predictors of adverse outcome were low Apgar score, presence of moderate-to-severe PPHN, need for higher ventilatory settings, and shock. Antenatal detection of diaphragmatic hernia did not impact survival rates.

Keywords: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; neonates; prognostic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The mean AaDO2 in first 24 hours of admission was significantly higher in non survivor group
Figure 2
Figure 2
The mean Oxygenation index within first 24 hours was significantly higher in non survivors
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival analysis showing most of the babies expired within 10 days of admission
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGivern MR, Best KE, Rankin J, Wellesley D, Greenlees R, Addor MC, et al. Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: A register-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100:F137–44. - PubMed
    1. Chandrasekaran A, Rathnavelu E, Mulage L, Ninan B, Balakrishnan U, Amboiram P, et al. Postnatal predictors for outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A single-center retrospective cohort study from India. Indian J Child Health. 2016;14:1–6.
    1. Panda SS, Bajpai M, Srinivas M. Presence of hernia sac in prediction of postoperative outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:1041–3. - PubMed
    1. Molugan M, Kamalarathnam CN, Muthukumaran J. Clinical profile of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and their short-term outcome in a tertiary care neonatal unit: A retrospective study. Indian J Child Health. 2017;4:435–7.
    1. dos Santos LR, Maksoud-Filho JG, Tannuri U, Andrade WC, Maksoud JG. Prognostic factors and survival in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2003;79:81–6. - PubMed