Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):2325967119852896.
doi: 10.1177/2325967119852896. eCollection 2019 Jun.

Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Medial Epicondyle Fractures After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Pitchers

Brandon J Erickson  1 , Peter N Chalmers  2 , John D'Angelo  3 , Kevin Ma  3 , Anthony A Romeo  1
Affiliations

Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Medial Epicondyle Fractures After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Pitchers

Brandon J Erickson et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) is a common procedure among professional baseball pitchers. An uncommon complication after UCLR is a fracture of the medial epicondyle at the level of the humeral tunnel, which requires open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the performance upon and rate of return to sport (RTS) in professional baseball pitchers after ORIF of the medial epicondyle and examine whether there is a difference in the RTS rate and performance between players who underwent ORIF and matched controls. It was hypothesized that there would be a high rate of RTS in professional baseball pitchers after ORIF of the medial epicondyle, with no difference between the ORIF and control groups in the rate of RTS or performance, specifically related to the primary performance outcome variables of win-loss percentage, walks plus hits per inning pitched, fielding independent pitching, and wins above replacement.

Methods: All professional baseball pitchers who underwent ORIF of the medial epicondyle between 2010 and 2016 were included in this study. Demographic and performance data (preoperative and postoperative) were recorded for each player. Performance metrics were then compared between the ORIF and control (no history of UCLR or ORIF) groups.

Results: Overall, 15 pitchers (80.0% starters, 73.3% right-handed) underwent ORIF of a medial epicondyle fracture. All had undergone prior UCLR using either the American Sports Medicine Institute (n = 9; 60.0%) or docking (n = 6; 40.0%) technique. ORIF techniques included fixation with 1 screw (n = 13; 86.7%) and fixation with suture anchors (n = 2; 13.3%). Eleven (73.3%) pitchers were able to return to sport (did not differ from controls; P = .537); 55% returned to the same level or higher. No significant differences existed in the primary performance outcome variables when comparing preoperative with postoperative performance. No significant differences in the primary performance outcome variables were seen between the ORIF and control groups after surgery, although players in the ORIF group pitched fewer innings than controls after surgery (P = .003).

Conclusion: After ORIF of the medial epicondyle in professional pitchers with a history of UCLR, 73.3% were able to return to sport (only 55% of those who returned pitched at the same level or higher) without a significant decline in most performance variables when compared with their preoperative performance or matched controls. The number of innings pitched declined after surgery.

Keywords: MLB; Major League Baseball; ORIF; UCLR; medial epicondyle; open reduction internal fixation; pitcher; return to sport; ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.J.E. has received research support from DePuy and Smith & Nephew. P.N.C. has received educational support from Tornier. A.A.R. has received research support from the Arthroscopy Association of North America, Aesculap/B. Braun, Arthrex, Histogenics, Medipost, Major League Baseball, NuTech, OrthoSpace, Smith & Nephew, and Zimmer; receives royalties from Arthrex, Saunders/Mosby-Elsevier, and SLACK; is a paid consultant for Arthrex; and is a paid speaker/presenter for Arthrex. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andrachuk JS, Scillia AJ, Aune KT, Andrews JR, Dugas JR, Cain EL. Symptomatic heterotopic ossification after ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction: clinical significance and treatment outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(5):1324–1328. - PubMed
    1. Andrews JR, Jost PW, Cain EL. The ulnar collateral ligament procedure revisited: the procedure we use. Sports Health. 2012;4(5):438–441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azar FM, Andrews JR, Wilk KE, Groh D. Operative treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28(1):16–23. - PubMed
    1. Cain EL, Jr, Andrews JR, Dugas JR, et al. Outcome of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow in 1281 athletes: results in 743 athletes with minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(12):2426–2434. - PubMed
    1. Dines JS, Yocum LA, Frank JB, ElAttrache NS, Gambardella RA, Jobe FW. Revision surgery for failed elbow medial collateral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(6):1061–1065. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources