Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of cognitive impairment no dementia in the first year post-stroke
- PMID: 31259264
- PMCID: PMC6591758
- DOI: 10.1177/2396987318825484
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of cognitive impairment no dementia in the first year post-stroke
Abstract
Introduction: Increasing attention is being paid to interventions for cognitive impairment (CI) post-stroke, including for CI that does not meet dementia criteria. The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) within one year post-stroke.
Patients and methods: Pubmed, EMBASE and PsychInfo were searched for papers published in English in 1995-2017. Included studies were population or hospital-based cohort studies for first-ever/recurrent stroke, assessing CIND using standardised criteria at 1-12 months post-stroke. Abstracts were screened, followed by full text review of potentially relevant articles. Data were extracted using a standard form, and study quality was appraised using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. A pooled prevalence of CIND with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistic.
Results: A total of 7000 abstracts were screened, followed by 1028 full text articles. Twenty-three articles were included in the systematic review, and 21 in the meta-analysis. The pooled CIND prevalence was 38% [95% CI = 32-43%] (I2=92.5%, p < 0.01). Study quality emerged as one source of heterogeneity. The five studies with the highest quality scores had no heterogeneity (I2=0%, p = 0.99), with a similar pooled prevalence (39%, 95%CI = 35-42%). Other sources of heterogeneity were stroke type, inclusion of pre-stroke CI, and age at assessment time.Discussion and conclusion: Meta-analysis of available studies indicates that in the first year post-stroke, 4 in 10 patients display a level of cognitive impairment that does not meet the criteria for dementia.
Keywords: Stroke; cognition; dementia; systematic reviews.
Figures
References
-
- Cumming TB, Brodtmann A, Darby D, et al. The importance of cognition to quality of life after stroke. J Psychosom Res 2014; 77: 374–379. - PubMed
-
- Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 1006–1018. - PubMed
-
- Harrison SL, Tang EYH, Keage HAD, et al. A systematic review of the definitions of vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia in cohort studies. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2016; 42: 69–79. - PubMed
-
- Petersen R, Doody R, Kurz A, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 1985–1992. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
