Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Sep;38(9):1169-1174.
doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001935.

Structural Differences in Meibum From Donors After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Structural Differences in Meibum From Donors After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations

Aparna Ramasubramanian et al. Cornea. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Meibum is considered to be a key component of tears that serve to protect the eye, and conformational changes in meibum have not been studied extensively within the population of patients who had hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of this study was to determine possible lipid conformational changes in the meibum of patients who had HSCT.

Methods: Participants who had HSCT were randomly sampled for this prospective comparative study. Control participants did not have dry eye or had not undergone allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy was used to measure meibum phase transition.

Results: Meibum was collected from both eyes of 36 donors without dry eye (Mc) and from 22 patients who had undergone HSCT (MHSCT). There were no significant differences between the phase transition parameters based on gender or race. The following were the significant differences (P < 0.0001) between the parameters for Mc compared with MHSCT : lipid order (% trans) at 33.4°C increased from 40 (1) to 54 (2), cooperativity decreased from 7.9 (0.4) to 5.4 (0.3), the phase transition temperature (C) increased from 30.3 (0.4) to 34.2 (0.9), and the magnitude of the phase transition (cm) increased from 4.0 (0.1) to 4.7 (0.5) (standard error of the mean).

Conclusions: Conformational and thermodynamic differences were observed between Mc and MHSCT. The changes observed in the lipid conformation of meibum from patients receiving HSCTs suggest that meibum composition changes after stem cell transplantation, and clinicians should consider treating the meibomian glands to improve the ocular surface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
A) Infrared spectra of the CH stretching region at 22 °C of a typical 36 year-old Caucasian adolescent female without dry eye (top), and a typical 31 year-old Caucasian adolescent female with dry eye and Graft-versus-host disease (bottom). B) Schematic showing trans and gauche conformations in lipid hydrocarbon chains. The greater the number of trans rotamers, the tighter the lipids pack, the stronger the van der Wall’s forces, the greater the lipid order and higher the lipid phase transition temperature. C) Typical lipid phase transitions of meibum from a 13 year-old Caucasian adolescent female without dry eye (●) and a 14 year-old Caucasian adolescent female with dry eye and Graft-versus-host disease (○). The CH2 symmetric stretching frequency is related to lipid structural order. The higher the value for the frequency, the more disordered the lipid. (─) Curve fit of data using the sigmoidal equation 1 (Experimental Section). D) Correlation between the lipid phase transition temperature and lipid order at 33.4 °C for human meibum. (●) Meibum from donors without dry eye. (o) Meibum from donors with dry eye and graft versus host disease. (★) Meibum from donors with meibomian gland dysfunction. Data are average ± the standard error of the mean.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Key lipid phase transition parameters from Table 1. All bars are statistically different from each other, P < 0.05 (Table 1). Data are average ± the standard error of the mean.

References

    1. Pasquini M, Zhu X. Current uses and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: CIBMTR Summary Slides, 2015. http://www.cibmtr.org.
    1. Antin JH. Clinical practice. Long-term care after hematopoietic-cell transplantation in adults. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(1):36–42. - PubMed
    1. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Robbins SL, Cotran RS. Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2005.
    1. Ferrara JL, Levine JE, Reddy P, Holler E. Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet. 2009;373:1550–1561. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jagasia MH, Greinix HT, Arora M, et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2014 Diagnosis and Staging Working Group Report. Biology of blood and marrow transplantation. J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplan. 2015;21:389–401.e381. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types