Predictors of Poor Global Alignment and Proportion Score After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
- PMID: 31261271
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003086
Predictors of Poor Global Alignment and Proportion Score After Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective observational study of a cohort of consecutive patients.
Objective: To determine 1) the correlation between clinical and radiographic outcomes and Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, and 2) which preoperative parameters predominantly influence the risk for poor GAP scores.
Summary of background data: Although numerous investigators have indicated their criteria for sagittal correction, it is still not unusual to observe poor outcome or complications even after ideal correction. The recently developed GAP score indicates spinopelvic alignment and setting surgical goals according to the score might decrease the prevalence of mechanical complications. However, there is no clear evidence of correlation between the GAP score and clinical outcomes, or which patient factors are preoperative predictors of poor postoperative GAP score.
Methods: We included 128 consecutive patients treated with spinal correction surgery who had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The correlations between clinical outcomes, increased proximal junctional angle, and GAP score were determined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to clarify potential preoperative risk factors for poor GAP score.
Results: Based on total GAP score, 32 (25%) patients were grouped into proportioned, 50 (39.1%) into moderately disproportioned, and 44 (34.3%) into severely disproportioned spinopelvic alignment. Our present study showed a significantly positive correlation between Oswestry Disability Index, increased proximal junctional angle 2 years after surgery, and total GAP score. Uni and multivariate regression analysis showed a large global tilt was a risk factor for a poor GAP score and that the risk for a poor GAP score increased with ageing.
Conclusions: Because GAP score correlated with Oswestry Disability Index and increased proximal junctional angle 2 years after surgery, GAP score might define targets for sagittal spinopelvic alignment for favorable outcomes of corrective spinal surgery. A large preoperative global tilt is a potential predictor of poor postoperative GAP score.
Level of evidence: 3.
References
-
- Soroceanu A, Diebo BG, Burton D, et al. Radiographical and implant-related complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, patient risk factors, and impact on health-related quality of life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015; 40:1414–1421.
-
- Passias PG, Soroceanu A, Yang S, et al. Predictors of revision surgical procedure excluding wound complications in adult spinal deformity and impact on patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction: a two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98:536–543.
-
- Soroceanu A, Burton DC, Oren JH, et al. Medical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41:1718–1723.
-
- Kato S, Fehlings MG, Lewis SJ, et al. An analysis of the incidence and outcomes of major versus minor neurological decline after complex adult spinal deformity surgery: a subanalysis of Scoli-RISK-1 Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018; 43:905–912.
-
- Iyer S, Sheha E, Fu MC, et al. Sagittal spinal alignment in adult spinal deformity: an overview of current concepts and a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 2018; 6:e2.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
