Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Jul 16;171(2):91-98.
doi: 10.7326/M16-2671. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

Safety-Net Hospitals, Neighborhood Disadvantage, and Readmissions Under Maryland's All-Payer Program: An Observational Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Safety-Net Hospitals, Neighborhood Disadvantage, and Readmissions Under Maryland's All-Payer Program: An Observational Study

Stephen F Jencks et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Safety-net hospitals have higher-than-expected readmission rates. The relative roles of the mean disadvantage of neighborhoods the hospitals serve and the disadvantage of individual patients in predicting a patient's readmission are unclear.

Objective: To examine the independent contributions of the patient's neighborhood and the hospital's service area to risk for 30-day readmission.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: Maryland.

Participants: All Maryland residents discharged from a Maryland hospital in 2015.

Measurements: Predictors included the disadvantage of neighborhoods for each Maryland resident (area disadvantage index) and the mean disadvantage of each hospital's discharged patients (safety-net index). The primary outcome was unplanned 30-day hospital readmission. Generalized estimating equations and marginal modeling were used to estimate readmission rates. Results were adjusted for clinical readmission risk.

Results: 13.4% of discharged patients were readmitted within 30 days. Patients living in neighborhoods at the 90th percentile of disadvantage had a readmission rate of 14.1% (95% CI, 13.6% to 14.5%) compared with 12.5% (CI, 11.8% to 13.2%) for similar patients living in neighborhoods at the 10th percentile. Patients discharged from hospitals at the 90th percentile of safety-net status had a readmission rate of 14.8% (CI, 13.4% to 16.1%) compared with 11.6% (CI, 10.5% to 12.7%) for similar patients discharged from hospitals at the 10th percentile of safety-net status. The association of readmission risk with the hospital's safety-net index was approximately twice the observed association with the patient's neighborhood disadvantage status.

Limitations: Generalizability outside Maryland is unknown. Confounding may be present.

Conclusion: In Maryland, residing in a disadvantaged neighborhood and being discharged from a hospital serving a large proportion of disadvantaged neighborhoods are independently associated with increased risk for readmission.

Primary funding source: National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Variation in ADI in Maryland. Data are from 2010–2013, the most recent data set available when the analysis was performed (13). ADI = area disadvantage index.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relationship between hospital safety-net index and adjusted readmission rate. Hospital safety-net index is the mean ADI for a hospital’s discharges. Readmission rates were indirectly adjusted for case mix to the statewide average. Points are scaled to reflect discharge volume, which ranged from 263 to 36 060. Correlation = 0.7. ADI = area disadvantage index.

Comment in

References

    1. Boccuti C, Casillas G. Aiming for fewer hospital U-turns: the Medicare Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2017. Accessed at https://www.kff.org/medicare/issue-brief/aiming-for-fewer-hospital-u-tur... 8 May 2019.
    1. Gilman M, Adams EK, Hockenberry JM, Milstein AS, Wilson IB, Becker ER. Safety-net hospitals more likely than other hospitals to fare poorly under Medicare’s value-based purchasing. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015;34:398–405. [PMID: 25732489] doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1059 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014. Pub L No 113–185, 128 Stat 1952.
    1. Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Report to Congress: Social Risk Factors and Performance Under Medicare’s Value-Based Purchasing Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2016.
    1. Kwan LY, Stratton K, Steinwachs DM. Accounting for Social Risk Factors in Medicare Payment. Washington, DC: National Academies Pr; 2017. - PubMed

Publication types