Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Aug 29;69(686):e595-e604.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704573. Print 2019 Sep.

Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care

Victoria Hammersley  1 , Eddie Donaghy  1 , Richard Parker  1 , Hannah McNeilly  2 , Helen Atherton  3 , Annemieke Bikker  1 , John Campbell  4 , Brian McKinstry  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care

Victoria Hammersley et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Growing demands on primary care services have led to policymakers promoting video consultations (VCs) to replace routine face-to-face consultations (FTFCs) in general practice.

Aim: To explore the content, quality, and patient experience of VC, telephone (TC), and FTFCs in general practice.

Design and setting: Comparison of audio-recordings of follow-up consultations in UK primary care.

Method: Primary care clinicians were provided with video-consulting equipment. Participating patients required a smartphone, tablet, or computer with camera. Clinicians invited patients requiring a follow-up consultation to choose a VC, TC, or FTFC. Consultations were audio-recorded and analysed for content and quality. Participant experience was explored in post-consultation questionnaires. Case notes were reviewed for NHS resource use.

Results: Of the recordings, 149/163 were suitable for analysis. VC recruits were younger, and more experienced in communicating online. FTFCs were longer than VCs (mean difference +3.7 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1 to 5.2) or TCs (+4.1 minutes, 95% CI = 2.6 to 5.5). On average, patients raised fewer problems in VCs (mean 1.5, standard deviation [SD] 0.8) compared with FTFCs (mean 2.1, SD 1.1) and demonstrated fewer instances of information giving by clinicians and patients. FTFCs scored higher than VCs and TCs on consultation-quality items.

Conclusion: VC may be suitable for simple problems not requiring physical examination. VC, in terms of consultation length, content, and quality, appeared similar to TC. Both approaches appeared less 'information rich' than FTFC. Technical problems were common and, though patients really liked VC, infrastructure issues would need to be addressed before the technology and approach can be mainstreamed in primary care.

Keywords: communication; general practice; health services research; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The process for setting up video consultation for clinicians and patients.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
How patients access Attend Anywhere. Image reproduced with permission.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Imison C, Castle-Clarke S, Watson R, Edwards N. Delivering the benefits of digital health care. 2016. https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/files/2017-01/delivering-the-benefits-o... (accessed 18 Jun 2019)
    1. McKinstry B, Watson P, Pinnock H, et al. Telephone consulting in primary care: a triangulated qualitative study of patients and providers. Br J Gen Pract. 2009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell JL, Fletcher E, Britten N, et al. Telephone triage for management of same-day consultation requests in general practice (the ESTEEM trial): a cluster-randomised controlled trial and cost-consequence analysis. Lancet. 2014;384(9957):1859–1868. - PubMed
    1. McKinstry B, Hammersley V, Burton C, et al. The quality, safety and content of telephone and face-to-face consultations: a comparative study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(4):298–303. - PubMed
    1. Pinnock H, Bawden R, Proctor S, et al. Accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness in primary care of routine telephone review of asthma: pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;326(7387):477–479. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types