Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 13:10:1052.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01052. eCollection 2019.

Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching

Affiliations

Lived Experience in New Models of Care for Substance Use Disorder: A Systematic Review of Peer Recovery Support Services and Recovery Coaching

David Eddie et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Peer recovery support services (PRSS) are increasingly being employed in a range of clinical settings to assist individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring psychological disorders. PRSS are peer-driven mentoring, education, and support ministrations delivered by individuals who, because of their own experience with SUD and SUD recovery, are experientially qualified to support peers currently experiencing SUD and associated problems. This systematic review characterizes the existing experimental, quasi-experimental, single- and multi-group prospective and retrospective, and cross-sectional research on PRSS. Findings to date tentatively speak to the potential of peer supports across a number of SUD treatment settings, as evidenced by positive findings on measures including reduced substance use and SUD relapse rates, improved relationships with treatment providers and social supports, increased treatment retention, and greater treatment satisfaction. These findings, however, should be viewed in light of many null findings to date, as well as significant methodological limitations of the existing literature, including inability to distinguish the effects of peer recovery support from other recovery support activities, heterogeneous populations, inconsistency in the definitions of peer workers and recovery coaches, and lack of any, or appropriate comparison groups. Further, role definitions for PRSS and the complexity of clinical boundaries for peers working in the field represent important implementation challenges presented by this novel class of approaches for SUD management. There remains a need for further rigorous investigation to establish the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-benefits of PRSS. Ultimately, such research may also help solidify PRSS role definitions, identify optimal training guidelines for peers, and establish for whom and under what conditions PRSS are most effective.

Keywords: addiction; peer recovery support services; peers; recovery coaching; substance use disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature review diagram showing article review and selection.

References

    1. Andreas D., Ja D. Y., Wilson S. (2010). Peers reach out supporting peers to embrace recovery (PROSPER): a center for substance abuse treatment recovery community services program. Alcohol. Treat. Q. 28, 326–338. 10.1080/07347324.2010.488538 - DOI
    1. Armitage E. V., Lyons H., Moore T. L. (2010). Recovery association project (RAP), Portland, Oregon. Alcohol. Treat. Q. 28, 339–357. 10.1080/07347324.2010.488539 - DOI
    1. Ashford R. D., Curtis B., Brown A. M. (2018). Peer-delivered harm reduction and recovery support services: initial evaluation from a hybrid recovery community drop-in center and syringe exchange program. Harm Reduct. J. 15:52. 10.1186/s12954-018-0258-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bassuk E. L., Hanson J., Greene R. N., Richard M., Laudet A. (2016). Peer-delivered recovery support services for addictions in the United States: a systematic review. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 63, 1–9. 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernstein J., Bernstein E., Tassiopoulos K., Heeren T., Levenson S., Hingson R. (2005). Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 77, 49–59. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.07.006 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types