Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jun 13:9:207.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00207. eCollection 2019.

The PD-1/PD-L1 Axis and Virus Infections: A Delicate Balance

Affiliations
Review

The PD-1/PD-L1 Axis and Virus Infections: A Delicate Balance

Günther Schönrich et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and its ligands play a fundamental role in the evasion of tumor cells from antitumor immunity. Less well appreciated is the fact that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis also regulates antiviral immune responses and is therefore modulated by a number of viruses. Upregulation of PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 is observed during acute virus infection and after infection with persistent viruses including important human pathogens such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV). Experimental evidence suggests that insufficient signaling through the PD-1 pathway promotes immunopathology during acute infection by exaggerating primary T cell responses. If chronic infection is established, however, high levels of PD-1 expression can have unfavorable immunological consequences. Exhaustion and suppression of antiviral immune responses can result in viral immune evasion. The role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis during viral infections is further complicated by evidence that PD-L1 also mediates inflammatory effects in the acute phase of an immune response. In this review, we discuss the intricate interplay between viruses and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis.

Keywords: PD-1; PD-L1; PD-L2; antiviral immune responses; viral immune evasion; virus-induced immunopathogenesis; viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PD-L1 mediated viral regulation of T cell activation. Upper graph: In the absence of viral infection mature dendritic cells (DCs) express relatively low levels of PD-L1. Recognition of cognate antigen (Ag) bound to MHC class I molecules by T cell receptor (TCR) results in upregulation of PD-1 on T cells. DCs express co-stimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 allowing efficient co-stimulation of T cells via CD28. The PD-1/PD-L1 axis is not co-inhibitory due to restriction by cis-PD-L1/CD80 interactions, and thus T cells are activated. Lower graph: In the context of viral infection DCs upregulate PD-L1 due to exposure to viral PAMPs and high levels of type I IFN. The restricting cis-PD-L1/CD80 interactions are most likely overwhelmed by virus-induced PD-L1 resulting in PD-1 signaling and prevention of T cell activation. The consequences of this for the generation of Tregs is as of yet unknown.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint in acute virus infection. Early phase: The infected tissue produces type I IFNs and possibly type III IFNs, which strongly induce antiviral IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) but only moderate PD-L1 levels. Antiviral CD8+ T cells eliminate virus-infected cells. At this stage, the PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint activity is low and does not restrict the antiviral immune response. Late Phase: Type II IFN and TNF-α is secreted by CD8+ T cells and other immune cells. In addition, hematopoietic cells such as plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) produce large amounts of type I IFN. This results not only in virus elimination but also increases PD-L1 expression. The high checkpoint activity downregulates terminal differentiation of antiviral CD8+ T cells. Ideally, the strength and quality of the CD8+ T cell response is balanced out in such a way that the viral intruder is eliminated without causing immunopathology.

References

    1. Abdelsamed H. A., Moustaki A., Fan Y., Dogra P., Ghoneim H. E., Youngblood B. (2017). Human memory CD8 T cell effector potential is epigenetically preserved during in vivo homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 214, 1593–1606. 10.1084/jem.20161760 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agata Y., Kawasaki A., Nishimura H., Ishida Y., Tsubata T., Yagita H., et al. . (1996). Expression of the PD-1 antigen on the surface of stimulated mouse T and B lymphocytes. Int. Immunol. 8, 765–772. - PubMed
    1. Ahn E., Araki K., Hashimoto M., Li W., Riley J. L., Cheung J., et al. . (2018). Role of PD-1 during effector CD8 T cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 4749–4754. 10.1073/pnas.1718217115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aichele P., Unsoeld H., Koschella M., Schweier O., Kalinke U., Vucikuja S. (2006). CD8 T cells specific for lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus require type I IFN receptor for clonal expansion. J. Immunol. 176, 4525–4529. 10.4049/jimmunol.176.8.4525 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akhmetzyanova I., Drabczyk M., Neff C. P., Gibbert K., Dietze K. K., Zelinskyy G. (2015). PD-L1 expression on retrovirus-infected cells mediates immune escape from CD8+ T cell killing. PLoS Pathog. 11:e1005224 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005224 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types