Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;276(9):2549-2557.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05520-7. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

Assessment of the cancerization risk for oral potentially malignant disorders by clinical risk model combined with autofluorescence and brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry

Affiliations

Assessment of the cancerization risk for oral potentially malignant disorders by clinical risk model combined with autofluorescence and brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry

Zhida Sun et al. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the feasibility of assessing the cancerization risk of oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) through a clinical risk model combined with autofluorescence and brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry.

Methods: We collected the baseline clinical data of 269 patients; then, performed autofluorescence, brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry and histopathological examination. Then, we obtained the significant factors by univariate logistic analysis, constructed the clinical risk model by multiple logistic regression and selected the optimal cutoff value according to the maximum Youden index. Finally, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the clinical risk score ≥ cutoff value, autofluorescence and brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry, and plotted the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: The clinical risk model is represented by the formula: 1 × gender + 1.6 × age group + 1 × lesion site + 1.4 × local stimulus + 1.5 × drink. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.83, and the optimal cutoff score was 3. The AUC indicated that the clinical risk score ≥ 3 (0.74) and autofluorescence (0.77) had a certain diagnostic values, while brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry (0.92) displayed a good value. Besides, the DCA showed that all three tests had clinical significance.

Conclusions: The cancerization risk of patients can be assessed by the clinical risk model combined with sequence application of autofluorescence and brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry, to decide whether histopathological examination or other intervention measures should be selected.

Keywords: Autofluorescence; Brush biopsy with DNA-image cytometry; Cancerization risk; Model; Oral potentially malignant disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BMJ. 2003 Sep 27;327(7417):716-9 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 2004 May 30;23(10):1631-60 - PubMed
    1. Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):128-38 - PubMed
    1. Evid Based Dent. 2010;11(1):24 - PubMed
    1. Dent Clin North Am. 2011 Jan;55(1):63-88 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources