Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;27(6):490-500.
doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12561. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

Quality indicators and community pharmacy services: a scoping review

Nour Alhusein  1 , Margaret C Watson  2
Affiliations

Quality indicators and community pharmacy services: a scoping review

Nour Alhusein et al. Int J Pharm Pract. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Quality indicators are a commonly used improvement tool in health care. There is growing interest and activity in the use of quality indicators to improve community pharmacy practice.

Objectives: To conduct a scoping review of the use of quality indicators for community pharmacy practice, including their methods of development and evaluation.

Methods: Electronic databases (EMBASE and PubMed) were searched to identify papers published between January 2008 and April 2018. No limits were applied for language of publication or country of origin. Studies were included if they reported empirical data regarding the development or evaluation of quality indicators. All study designs were eligible for inclusion. Duplicate independent screening was undertaken of the search results. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer.

Results: Of the 988 records identified from the database search, 15 articles were included. The studies were conducted in 12 countries from six continents. Eleven studies described the development of quality indicators, eight of which included the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the indicators developed. Four studies examined the impact of quality indicators on practice all of which reported improvements in some aspects of quality, mainly with structure indicators rather than those relating to process and outcome.

Conclusions: Whilst there is a growing emphasis on promoting improvement in community pharmacy services, evidence is lacking of the effect of indicators on improving quality. Measurable process and outcome indicators are needed. The future development of quality indicators would also benefit from a multi-stakeholder approach.

Keywords: healthcare quality indicators; pharmaceutical services; pharmacies; pharmacists; quality improvement; quality of health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Author(s) declare(s) that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart of study selection process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Nembhard IM et al Why does the quality of health care continue to lag? Insights from management research. Acad Manag Perspect 2009; 23: 24–42.
    1. Berwick DM. The science of improvement. JAMA 2008; 299: 1182–1184. - PubMed
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1999. - PubMed
    1. Hurtado et al, eds. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow SA. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1611–25. - PubMed

Publication types