Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 31265207
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.14857
Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of surgeon experience, body habitus, and bony pelvic dimensions on surgeon performance and patient outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Patients, subjects and methods: The pelvic dimensions of 78 RARP patients were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography by three radiologists. Surgeon automated performance metrics (APMs [instrument motion tracking and system events data, i.e., camera movement, third-arm swap, energy use]) were obtained by a systems data recorder (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) during RARP. Two analyses were performed: Analysis 1, examined effects of patient characteristics, pelvic dimensions and prior surgeon RARP caseload on APMs using linear regression; Analysis 2, the effects of patient body habitus, bony pelvic measurement, and surgeon experience on short- and long-term outcomes were analysed by multivariable regression.
Results: Analysis 1 showed that while surgeon experience affected the greatest number of APMs (P < 0.044), the patient's body mass index, bony pelvic dimensions, and prostate size also affected APMs during each surgical step (P < 0.043, P < 0.046, P < 0.034, respectively). Analysis 2 showed that RARP duration was significantly affected by pelvic depth (β = 13.7, P = 0.039) and prostate volume (β = 0.5, P = 0.024). A wider and shallower pelvis was less likely to result in a positive margin (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.72). On multivariate analysis, urinary continence recovery was associated with surgeon's prior RARP experience (hazard ratio [HR] 2.38, 95% CI 1.18-4.81; P = 0.015), but not on pelvic dimensions (HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.95-2.17).
Conclusion: Limited surgical workspace, due to a narrower and deeper pelvis, does affect surgeon performance and patient outcomes, most notably in longer surgery time and an increased positive margin rate.
Keywords: #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; pelvis; prostatectomy; robotic surgical procedures; urinary incontinence.
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
- 
  
  Re: Effect of Surgeon Experience and Bony Pelvic Dimensions on Surgical Performance and Patient Outcomes in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):645-646. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000720.01. Epub 2020 Jan 7. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31909663 No abstract available.
References
- 
    - Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424
 
- 
    - Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR. Trends in management for patients with localized prostate cancer, 1990-2013. JAMA 2015; 314: 80-2
 
- 
    - Gill I, Cacciamani G. LBA3: the changing face of urologic oncologic surgery from 2000-2018 (63 141 patients) - Impact of robotics. J Urol 2018; 199(Suppl.): e577-8
 
- 
    - Boczko J, Erturk E, Joseph JV. Is there a proper pelvic size for an extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 2007; 21: 1353-6
 
- 
    - Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA et al. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 69: 300-5
 
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
- Full Text Sources
- Medical
 
        