Contemporary Imaging of Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 31266725
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.05.177
Contemporary Imaging of Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Degenerative or fibrocalcific aortic stenosis (AS) is now the most common native valvular heart disease assessed and managed by cardiologists in developed countries. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the quintessential imaging modality for the non-invasive characterisation of AS due to its widespread availability, superior assessment of flow haemodynamics, and a wealth of prognostic data accumulated over decades of clinical utility and research applications. With expanding technologies and increasing availability of treatment options such as transcatheter aortic valve replacements, in addition to conventional surgical approaches, accurate and precise assessment of AS severity is critical to guide decisions for and timing of interventions. Despite clear guideline echocardiographic parameters demarcating severe AS, discrepancies between transvalvular velocities, gradients, and calculated valve areas are commonly encountered in clinical practice. This often results in diagnostically challenging cases with significant implications. Greater emphasis must be placed on the quality of performance of basic two dimensional (2D) and Doppler measurements (attention to detail ensuring accuracy and precision), incorporating ancillary haemodynamic surrogates, understanding study- or patient-specific confounders, and recognising the role and limitations of stress echocardiography in the subgroups of low-flow low-gradient AS. A multiparametric approach, along with the incorporation of multimodality imaging (cardiac computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) in certain scenarios, is now mandatory to avoid incorrect misclassification of severe AS. This is essential to ensure appropriate selection of patients who would most benefit from interventions on the aortic valve to relieve the afterload mismatch resulting from truly severe valvular stenosis.
Keywords: Aortic stenosis; Assessment; Echocardiography; Flow (or gradient); Imaging.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Solving the Conundrum Using Multi-Modality Imaging.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Nov-Dec;61(5-6):416-422. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 13. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018. PMID: 30445161 Review.
-
Bicuspid Aortic Valve: What to Image in Patients Considered for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep;10(9):e005987. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.005987. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28877885 Review. No abstract available.
-
Cardiac Imaging for Assessing Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.002. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28183438 Review.
-
Challenges in the echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis.Future Cardiol. 2014 Jul;10(4):541-52. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.33. Future Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25301316 Review.
-
Impact of Vascular Hemodynamics on Aortic Stenosis Evaluation: New Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Normal Flow-Small Aortic Valve Area-Low Gradient Pattern.J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 7;6(7):e006276. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006276. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28687561 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Models and Techniques to Study Aortic Valve Calcification in Vitro, ex Vivo and in Vivo. An Overview.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jun 2;13:835825. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.835825. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 35721220 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials