Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
- PMID: 31267903
Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of lightweight and heavyweight mesh on postoperative recovery in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair. PubMed, Embase, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Library were used to search for published clinical randomized controlled trials, which compared lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in TEP inguinal hernia repair. The outcomes were calculated as risk ratios with 95 per cent confidence intervals using RevMan 5.2. Eight randomized controlled trials were included. Compared with a heavyweight mesh, the lightweight mesh led to a higher incidence of recurrence (risk ratio = 2.52, 95% confidence interval 1.10-5.81; P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in chronic moderate to severe pain, foreign body sensation, and seroma. The use of lightweight mesh is not recommended for TEP inguinal hernia repair.
Similar articles
-
Lightweight mesh is recommended in open inguinal (Lichtenstein) hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery. 2020 Mar;167(3):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Oct 28. Surgery. 2020. PMID: 31672519
-
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.Hernia. 2012 Oct;16(5):505-18. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0901-x. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Hernia. 2012. PMID: 22371213
-
A meta-analysis comparing lightweight meshes with heavyweight meshes in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.Surg Innov. 2013 Feb;20(1):24-31. doi: 10.1177/1553350612463444. Epub 2012 Oct 16. Surg Innov. 2013. PMID: 23075529 Review.
-
Lightweight Versus Heavyweight Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Sep;29(9):1152-1162. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0363. Epub 2019 Aug 1. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019. PMID: 31373875
-
Lightweight versus heavyweight in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis.Hernia. 2012 Oct;16(5):529-39. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0928-z. Epub 2012 Jun 12. Hernia. 2012. PMID: 22689249
Cited by
-
Chronic inguinal pain post-hernioplasty. Laparo-endoscopic surgery vs lichtenstein repair: systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1427-1439. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03077-x. Epub 2024 Jun 5. Hernia. 2024. PMID: 38837072
-
Clinical outcome of OviTex reinforced tissue matrix in hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Qatar Med J. 2025 Feb 17;2025(1):22. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.22. eCollection 2025. Qatar Med J. 2025. PMID: 40432988 Free PMC article.
-
Our Experience With 200 Cases of Inguinal Hernia Repair Using the Dynamic Self-Adjusting Prosthesis: A Case Series and Literature Review.Cureus. 2024 Aug 30;16(8):e68258. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68258. eCollection 2024 Aug. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39350877 Free PMC article.
-
Thoracoscopic mesh implantation as a definitive treatment approach for peritoneal dialysis-associated hydrothorax.Updates Surg. 2022 Dec;74(6):2011-2017. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01356-9. Epub 2022 Aug 21. Updates Surg. 2022. PMID: 35988114 Free PMC article.
-
Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5):zrad080. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080. BJS Open. 2023. PMID: 37862616 Free PMC article.