Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
- PMID: 31267907
Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for the Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
Abstract
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the value of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI (DCE-MRI) in evaluating the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases (from building to July 31, 2018) were searched to collect articles about the therapeutic evaluation of NAC using the quantitative DCE-MRI in patients with breast cancer. The sensitivities and specificities of quantitative DCE-MRI in the evaluation of NAC for breast cancer were extracted from the articles. Meta-DiSc1.4 was applied to evaluate the efficacy of the sensitivity and specificity; forest figure and summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) were created. A total of 356 articles were enrolled in this study, including 739 cases in total, in which 218 cases were effective and the other 521 cases were ineffective to NAC, considering the pathological results as the gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity in the included 14 articles of quantitative DCE-MRI (Ktrans, Kep, and ve) in comprehensively evaluating NAC for breast cancer were 84 per cent (95% confidence interval (CI): 78-88%) and 83 per cent (95% CI: 79-86%), respectively. The area under SROC was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.867-0.943). The sensitivity and specificity in the three articles of Ktrans evaluating NAC for breast cancer were 84.1 per cent (95% CI: 71.0-92.1%) and 81.3 per cent (95% CI: 70.5%-88.5%), respectively. The area under SROC was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.834-0.962). Our study confirmed that the quantitative DCE-MRI is able to monitor NAC treatment for breast cancer because of its high sensitivity and specificity. However, there is a high degree of heterogeneity in published studies, highlighting the lack of standardization in the field.
Similar articles
-
Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Ultrasound in Breast Cancer.Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):682-691. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.682. Epub 2018 Jun 14. Korean J Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29962874 Free PMC article.
-
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological response after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.Invest Radiol. 2015 Apr;50(4):195-204. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000100. Invest Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25360603 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by diffusion tensor imaging: Initial results.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1080-1090. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25855. Epub 2017 Sep 13. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018. PMID: 28901594
-
The assessment of pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients with DCE-MRI and DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Radiol. 2023 Oct;96(1150):20230239. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20230239. Epub 2023 Sep 3. Br J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37660472 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic performance of CESM and CE-MRI in evaluating the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Br J Radiol. 2020 Aug;93(1112):20200301. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200301. Epub 2020 Jul 2. Br J Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32574075 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Assessment and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Imaging Modalities and Future Perspectives.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;13(14):3521. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143521. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34298733 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current Landscape of Breast Cancer Imaging and Potential Quantitative Imaging Markers of Response in ER-Positive Breast Cancers Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 9;12(6):1511. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061511. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32527022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Twenty Years On: RECIST as a Biomarker of Response in Solid Tumours an EORTC Imaging Group - ESOI Joint Paper.Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;11:800547. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.800547. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35083155 Free PMC article.
-
Differentiation between primary central nervous system lymphomas and gliomas according to pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Heliyon. 2024 Jun 6;10(12):e32619. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32619. eCollection 2024 Jun 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38952379 Free PMC article.
-
Combined molybdenum target X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging examinations improve breast cancer diagnostic efficacy.World J Clin Cases. 2022 Jan 14;10(2):485-491. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.485. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 35097073 Free PMC article.