Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Feb 13;296(6620):467.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6620.467.

Does infection with HIV affect the outcome of pregnancy?

Affiliations

Does infection with HIV affect the outcome of pregnancy?

F D Johnstone et al. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

PIP: Details are presented on the outcome of pregnancy in a group of Edinburgh women identified as positive for antibodies to HIV and in women who had a history of drug abuse or a partner known to be seropositive but who were themselves negative for HIV antibody. Pregnant women who had been tested for HIV up to June 1987 were identified. HIV state was known for 205 pregnant women. Most cases were determined during pregnancy, but in 23 (9 seropositive patients) it was determined retrospectively. Seropositivity was only found in women who had been intravenous drug users or whose partner was known seropositive. Of 50 women who were seropositive, 46 were intravenous drug users and 4 had seropositive partners. In 64 cases who were seronegative, 45 had used intravenous drugs since 1983, and 19 had a seropositive partner. These women tended to be young, unmarried, and smoked heavily. They usually lived in areas of Edinburgh with multiple deprivation. Both they and their partners were usually unemployed. In the seropositive group, spontaneous abortion showed an apparent increase, but this may be due to differences in ascertainment as the incidence in the seronegative group was low. Premature delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, and low birth weight were common compared with the total population, but seropositive and seronegative women did not differ from each other in these variables. Compared with rates in the total population of Edinburgh, the rates of prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation were increased more than 2-fold and the rate of low birthweight babies was increased nearly 4-fold, though the 1 twin pregnancy contributed to this. Adverse outcome was equally distributed between the seropositive and seronegative women, and there was no suggestion that infection with HIV itself had any effect. Although no evidence from this study shows that infection with HIV per se affects the outcome of pregnancy, none of these women showed symptomatic illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. JAMA. 1985 Jan 18;253(3):363-6 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1987 May 23;1(8543):1164-8 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):285-7 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Feb 22;292(6519):527-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources