Response to the Comment on "Meta-analysis of Effect of Volume (Hospital and Operator) on Carotid Revascularization Outcomes"
- PMID: 31268898
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003411
Response to the Comment on "Meta-analysis of Effect of Volume (Hospital and Operator) on Carotid Revascularization Outcomes"
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
High Operator and Hospital Volume Are Associated With a Decreased Risk of Death and Stroke After Carotid Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):631-641. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002880. Ann Surg. 2019. PMID: 30102632 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Poorthuis MHF, Brand EC, Halliday A, et al. High operator and hospital volume are associated with a decreased risk of death and stroke after carotid revascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019; 269:631–641.
-
- Müller MD, von Felten S, Algra A, et al. Immediate and delayed procedural stroke or death in stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 2018; 49:2715–2722.
-
- Huibers A, Calvet D, Kennedy F, et al. Mechanism of procedural stroke following carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting within the international carotid stenting study (ICSS) randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 50:281–288.
-
- de Borst GJ, Moll FL, van de Pavoordt HD, et al. Stroke from carotid endarterectomy: when and how to reduce perioperative stroke rate? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 21:484–489.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
