Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Oct;39(10):1340-1348.
doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean

Affiliations
Observational Study

The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean

Anjali J Kaimal et al. J Perinatol. 2019 Oct.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association of patient preferences and attitudes with TOLAC.

Study design: Prospective observational study of TOLAC-eligible women at 26-34 weeks gestation. Preferences (utilities) were elicited using the time trade-off and standard gamble metrics. Logistic regression was used to identify preference- and attitude-based factors associated with TOLAC.

Results: Of the 231 participants, most (n = 197, 85%) preferred vaginal delivery, but only 40% (n = 93) underwent TOLAC. Utilities for uterine rupture outcomes did not differ based on delivery approach. In multivariable analysis, strength of preference for vaginal delivery, value for the experience of labor, and the opinion of the person whom the participant thought of as most important to this decision were associated with TOLAC.

Conclusions: Future decision support interventions incorporating individualized information regarding the likelihood of vaginal birth and empowering patients to express their preferences and engage their families in the decision-making process may improve decision quality and increase TOLAC rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None of the authors have any relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: Final data for 2015. National vital statistics report; vol 66, no 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2017. - PubMed
    1. ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/n... accessed 4/30/17.
    1. Guise J-M, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu R, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights. Evidence report/Technology assessment no.191. (prepared by the Oregon Health & Science University Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-2007-10057-I). AHRQ publication no. 10-E003. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. March 2010.
    1. Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Rouse DJ, Varner MW, et al. The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25(1):37–43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450–463. - PubMed

Publication types