Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;26(6):1803-1849.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01629-2.

Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review

Hanneke Scholten  1 , Anouk Scheres  2 , Erik de Water  2   3 , Uta Graf  2 , Isabela Granic  2 , Maartje Luijten  2
Affiliations

Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review

Hanneke Scholten et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

In everyday decision-making, individuals make trade-offs between short-term and long-term benefits or costs. Depending on many factors, individuals may choose to wait for larger delayed reward, yet in other situations they may prefer the smaller, immediate reward. In addition to within-subject variation in the short-term versus long-term reward trade-off, there are also interindividual differences in delay discounting (DD), which have been shown to be quite stable. The extent to which individuals discount the value of delayed rewards turns out to be associated with important health and disorder-related outcomes: the more discounting, the more unhealthy or problematic choices. This has led to the hypothesis that DD can be conceptualized as trans-disease process. The current systematic review presents an overview of behavioral trainings and manipulations that have been developed to reduce DD in human participants aged 12 years or older. Manipulation studies mostly contain one session and measure DD directly after the manipulation. Training studies add a multiple session training component that is not per se related to DD, in between two DD task measurements. Ninety-eight studies (151 experiments) were identified that tested behavioral trainings and manipulations to decrease DD. Overall, results indicated that DD can be decreased, showing that DD is profoundly context dependent and changeable. Most promising avenues to pursue in future research seem to be acceptance-based/mindfulness-based trainings, and even more so manipulations involving a future orientation. Limitations and recommendations are discussed to identify the mechanistic processes that allow for changes in discount rate and behavior accordingly.

Keywords: Delay discounting; Health behaviors; Manipulations; Temporal discounting; Trainings; Trans-disease process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of literature search and selection process for inclusion in the systematic review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ainslie G. Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin. 1975;82:463–496. doi: 10.1037/h0076860. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ainslie G. Picoeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
    1. Ainslie G. Breakdown of will. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
    1. Amlung M, MacKillop J. Clarifying the relationship between impulsive delay discounting and nicotine dependence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2014;28:761–768. doi: 10.1037/a0036726. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amlung M, Petker T, Jackson J, Balodis I, MacKillop J. Steep discounting of delayed monetary and food rewards in obesity: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2016;46:2423–2434. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000866. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources