Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;20(7):932-940.
doi: 10.1111/pedi.12887. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Vulnerabilities in diabetic eye screening for children and young people in England

Collaborators, Affiliations

Vulnerabilities in diabetic eye screening for children and young people in England

Maria C Ibanez-Bruron et al. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Children and young people (CYP) living with diabetes require integrated child-centered care. We hypothesized that suboptimal uptake to diabetic retinopathy screening in CYP may be partly related to the degree of services integration. We investigated the structure of the current pediatric diabetic eye care pathway and associations between service-level characteristics and screening uptake.

Methods: A quality improvement project between January and May 2017 comprising a survey of practice of all 158 pediatric diabetes services (pediatric diabetes units, PDUs) across England and secondary data analysis of routinely collected service data. Generalized linear models for proportional responses were fitted to investigate associations between reported PDU characteristics and screening uptake.

Results: 124 PDUs (78%) responded. In 67% (n = 83), patients could be referred directly to screening programs; the remainder relied on primary care for onward referral. 97% (n = 120) considered eye screening results useful for counseling patients but only 65% (n = 81) reported it was "easy" to obtain them. Factors independently associated with higher screening uptake were a higher proportion of patients referred from primary care (OR = 1.005; 95%CI = 1.004-1.007 per 1% of increase), absence of "out-of-catchment area" patients (OR = 1.13; 95%CI = 1.04-1.22), and easy access to eye screening results (OR = 1.45; 95%CI = 1.34-1.56).

Conclusions: There is limited direct communication between the services involved in diabetic eye care for CYP in England. This risks reducing the effectiveness of diabetic retinopathy screening. Similar vulnerabilities are likely to exist in other countries where retinopathy screening for CYP has been "bolted on" to provision for adults.

Keywords: child care; diabetic retinopathy; integrated health care systems; ophthalmology; screening programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, et al. Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002-2012. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1419-1429.
    1. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. 2017. http://www.diabetes.org/assets/pdfs/basics/cdc-statistics-report-2017.pdf. Accessed March 2019.
    1. National Paediatrics Diabetes Audit (NPDA). National Paediatric Diabetes Audit Report 2015-2016 Report 1: Care Processes and Outcomes. 2017. https://www.hqip.org.uk/resource/national-paediatric-diabetes-audit-repo.... Accessed March 2019.
    1. Fox DA, Islam N, Sutherland J, Reimer K, Amed S. Type 1 diabetes incidence and prevalence trends in a cohort of Canadian children and youth. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(3):501-505.
    1. Chen Y, TA-Ohoo W, Liu X, Shankar RR. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among US Pediatric population in the MarketScan multi-state Medicaid database. Pediatr Diabetes. 2019;2002-2016. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12842.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources