Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 3;7(3):e13627.
doi: 10.2196/13627.

Descriptive Usability Study of CirrODS: Clinical Decision and Workflow Support Tool for Management of Patients With Cirrhosis

Affiliations

Descriptive Usability Study of CirrODS: Clinical Decision and Workflow Support Tool for Management of Patients With Cirrhosis

Jennifer Hornung Garvin et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

Background: There are gaps in delivering evidence-based care for patients with chronic liver disease and cirrhosis.

Objective: Our objective was to use interactive user-centered design methods to develop the Cirrhosis Order Set and Clinical Decision Support (CirrODS) tool in order to improve clinical decision-making and workflow.

Methods: Two work groups were convened with clinicians, user experience designers, human factors and health services researchers, and information technologists to create user interface designs. CirrODS prototypes underwent several rounds of formative design. Physicians (n=20) at three hospitals were provided with clinical scenarios of patients with cirrhosis, and the admission orders made with and without the CirrODS tool were compared. The physicians rated their experience using CirrODS and provided comments, which we coded into categories and themes. We assessed the safety, usability, and quality of CirrODS using qualitative and quantitative methods.

Results: We created an interactive CirrODS prototype that displays an alert when existing electronic data indicate a patient is at risk for cirrhosis. The tool consists of two primary frames, presenting relevant patient data and allowing recommended evidence-based tests and treatments to be ordered and categorized. Physicians viewed the tool positively and suggested that it would be most useful at the time of admission. When using the tool, the clinicians placed fewer orders than they placed when not using the tool, but more of the orders placed were considered to be high priority when the tool was used than when it was not used. The physicians' ratings of CirrODS indicated above average usability.

Conclusions: We developed a novel Web-based combined clinical decision-making and workflow support tool to alert and assist clinicians caring for patients with cirrhosis. Further studies are underway to assess the impact on quality of care for patients with cirrhosis in actual practice.

Keywords: clinical decision support; human factors engineering; interview; liver cirrhosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design process. CirrODS: Cirrhosis Order Set and Clinical Decision Support.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Initial clinical decision and workflow support tool prototype used in simulations. GI: gastrointestinal.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of concept design envisioned at the end of the design workshop.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Examples from participant interviews of six positions representing perceived barriers and facilitators reported by Liberati et al [50]. CDSS: clinical decision support system.

References

    1. Murray CJL, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, Birbeck G, Burstein R, Chou D, Dellavalle R, Danaei G, Ezzati M, Fahimi A, Flaxman D, Gabriel S, Gakidou E, Kassebaum N, Khatibzadeh S, Lim S, Lipshultz SE, London S, MacIntyre MF, Mokdad AH, Moran A, Mozaffarian D, Murphy T, Naghavi M, Pope C, Roberts T, Salomon J, Schwebel DC, Shahraz S, Sleet DA, Abraham J, Ali MK, Bartels DH, Chen H, Criqui MH, Ding EL, Dorsey ER, Ebel BE, Flaxman S, Flaxman AD, Gonzalez-Medina D, Grant B, Hagan H, Hoffman H, Leasher JL, Lin J, Lozano R, Lu Y, Mallinger L, McDermott MM, Micha R, Miller TR, Mokdad AA, Narayan KMV, Omer SB, Pelizzari PM, Phillips D, Ranganathan D, Rivara FP, Sampson U, Sanman E, Sapkota A, Sharaz S, Shivakoti R, Singh GM, Singh D, Tavakkoli M, Towbin JA, Wilkinson JD, Zabetian A, Alvardo M, Baddour LM, Benjamin EJ, Bolliger I, Carnahan E, Chugh SS, Cohen A, Colson KE, Cooper LT, Couser W, Dabhadkar KC, Dicker D, Duber H, Engell RE, Felson DT, Finucane MM, Fleming T, Forouzanfar MH, Freedman G, Freeman MK, Gillum RF, Gosselin R, Gutierrez HR, Havmoeller R, Jacobsen KH, James SL, Jasrasaria R, Jayarman S, Johns N, Kassebaum N, Lan Q, Meltzer M, Mensah GA, Michaud C, Mock C, Moffitt TE, Nelson RG, Olives C, Ortblad K, Ostro B, Raju M, Razavi H, Ritz B, Sacco RL, Shibuya K, Silberberg D, Singh JA, Steenland K, Taylor JA, Thurston GD, Vavilala MS, Vos T, Wagner GR, Weinstock MA, Weisskopf MG, Wulf S. The state of US health, 1990-2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013 Aug 14;310(6):591–608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.13805.1710486 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 Jun 09;313(22):2263–2273. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5370.2319168 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu J, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016 Jun;65(4):1–122. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr65/nvsr65_4.pdf - PubMed
    1. Stepanova M, De Avila L, Afendy M, Younossi I, Pham H, Cable R, Younossi ZM. Direct and indirect economic burden of chronic liver disease in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;15(5):759–766. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.020.S1542-3565(16)30441-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Udompap P, Kim D, Kim WR. Current and future burden of chronic nonmalignant liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Nov;13(12):2031–2041. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.015. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26291665 S1542-3565(15)01114-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources