Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 4;9(1):9676.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46145-4.

Morphological Brain Age Prediction using Multi-View Brain Networks Derived from Cortical Morphology in Healthy and Disordered Participants

Affiliations

Morphological Brain Age Prediction using Multi-View Brain Networks Derived from Cortical Morphology in Healthy and Disordered Participants

Joshua Corps et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Brain development and aging are dynamic processes that unfold over years on multiple levels in both healthy and disordered individuals. Recent studies have revealed a disparity between the chronological brain age and the 'data-driven' brain age using functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion MRI (dMRI). Particularly, predicting the 'brain age' from connectomic data might help identify relevant connectional biomarkers of neurological disorders that emerge early or late in the lifespan. While prior brain-age prediction studies have relied exclusively on either structural or functional connectomic data, here we unprecedentedly propose to predict the morphological age of the brain by solely using morphological brain networks (derived from T1-weighted images) in both healthy and disordered populations. Besides, although T1-weighted MRI was widely used for brain age prediction, it was leveraged from an image-based analysis perspective not from a connectomic perspective. Our method includes the following steps: (i) building multi-view morphological brain networks (M-MBN), (ii) feature extraction and selection, (iii) training a machine-learning regression model to predict age from M-MBN data, and (iv) utilizing our model to identify connectional brain features related to age in both autistic and healthy populations. We demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches and discovered brain connectional morphological features that fingerprint the age of brain cortical morphology in both autistic and healthy individuals. In particular, we discovered that the connectional cortical thickness best predicts the morphological age of the autistic brain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age prediction accuracy for each of the 4 datasets (ASD Left Hemisphere, ASD Right Hemisphere, NC Left Hemisphere, and NC Right Hemisphere) using 4 benchmark methods against our proposed method (far right). Each method was evaluated on both averaged views and concatenated views.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Identification of morphological connectional features fingerprinting brain age. Circular graphs showing the top ranked 5 (A,B), 10 (C,D), and 15 (E,F) morphological connectional features that correlate most with age when using concatenation to combine the morphological views. Thicker edges indicate higher correlation with brain age.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cortical brain regions of interest used for morphological brain network reconstruction. The numbers with corresponding names can be linked to the circular graphs in Fig. 2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Proposed framework for predicting morphological brain age in healthy and disordered brains. (A) Construction of the multi-view brain networks from cortical morphology for each subject and the construction of the initial feature vector. For each subject k{1,,N}, we derive a morphological network km from the cortical surface Skm mapped using a specific morphological attribute m{1,,M}. (B) Next, we extract the lower triangular part of the matrix as a morphological connectional feature vector. (C) Reduce the dimensionality of the data and retain only the most relevant features using a feature selection method. Next, we train a Random Forest model and utilize it to predict the morphological age of a testing brain. (D) Connectional morphological features encoding chronological brain age.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Courchesne E, et al. Normal brain development and aging: quantitative analysis at in vivo MR imaging in healthy volunteers. Radiology. 2000;216(3):672–682. doi: 10.1148/radiology.216.3.r00au37672. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Driscoll I, et al. Longitudinal pattern of regional brain volume change differentiates normal aging from MCI. Neurology. 2009;72(22):1906–1913. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a82634. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scahill RI, et al. A longitudinal study of brain volume changes in normal aging using serial registered magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of neurology. 2003;60(7):989–994. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.7.989. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fjell AM, Walhovd KB. Structural brain changes in aging: courses, causes and cognitive consequences. Reviews in the Neurosciences. 2010;21(3):187–222. doi: 10.1515/REVNEURO.2010.21.3.187. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raz N, Ghisletta P, Rodrigue KM, Kennedy KM, Lindenberger U. Trajectories of brain aging in middle-aged and older adults: regional and individual differences. Neuroimage. 2010;51(2):501–511. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types