Monetary feedback modulates performance and electrophysiological indices of belief updating in reward learning
- PMID: 31274199
- DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13431
Monetary feedback modulates performance and electrophysiological indices of belief updating in reward learning
Abstract
Belief updating entails the incorporation of new information about the environment into internal models of the world. Bayesian inference is the statistically optimal strategy for performing belief updating in the presence of uncertainty. An important open question is whether the use of cognitive strategies that implement Bayesian inference is dependent upon motivational state and, if so, how this is reflected in electrophysiological signatures of belief updating in the brain. Here, we recorded the EEG of participants performing a simple reward learning task with both monetary and nonmonetary instructive feedback conditions. Our aim was to distinguish the influence of the rewarding properties of feedback on belief updating from the information content of the feedback itself. A Bayesian updating model allowed us to quantify different aspects of belief updating across trials, including the size of belief updates and the uncertainty of beliefs. Faster learning rates were observed in the monetary feedback condition compared to the instructive feedback condition, while belief updates were generally larger, and belief uncertainty smaller, with monetary compared to instructive feedback. Larger amplitudes in the monetary feedback condition were found for three ERP components: the P3a, the feedback-related negativity, and the late positive potential. These findings suggest that motivational state influences inference strategies in reward learning, and this is reflected in the electrophysiological correlates of belief updating.
Keywords: Bayesian inference; ERPs; belief updating; motivation; reward learning.
© 2019 Society for Psychophysiological Research.
Similar articles
-
State anxiety biases estimates of uncertainty and impairs reward learning in volatile environments.Neuroimage. 2021 Jan 1;224:117424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117424. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Neuroimage. 2021. PMID: 33035670
-
Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating(1,2,3).eNeuro. 2015 Oct 15;2(5):ENEURO.0076-15.2015. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0076-15.2015. eCollection 2015 Sep. eNeuro. 2015. PMID: 26473170 Free PMC article.
-
Frontal cortex electrophysiology in reward- and punishment-related feedback processing during advice-guided decision making: An interleaved EEG-DC stimulation study.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Apr;18(2):249-262. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0566-8. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29380293 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Oct;132(Pt B):184-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 15. Int J Psychophysiol. 2018. PMID: 29454641 Review.
-
Electrophysiological underpinnings of reward processing: Are we exploiting the full potential of EEG?Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118478. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118478. Epub 2021 Aug 14. Neuroimage. 2021. PMID: 34403744 Review.
Cited by
-
How predictability affects habituation to novelty.PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0237278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237278. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34061853 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence for the Beneficial Effect of Reward on Working Memory: A Meta-Analytic Study.J Intell. 2024 Sep 11;12(9):88. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12090088. J Intell. 2024. PMID: 39330467 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Achtziger, A., Alós-Ferrer, C., Hügelschäfer, S., & Steinhauser, M. (2014). The neural basis of belief updating and rational decision making. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss099
-
- Achtziger, A., Alós-Ferrer, C., Hügelschäfer, S., & Steinhauser, M. (2015). Higher incentives can impair performance: Neural evidence on reinforcement and rationality. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(11), 1477-1483. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv036
-
- Austerweil, J. L., Gershman, S. J., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Griffiths, T. L. (2015). Structure and flexibility in Bayesian models of cognition. In J. R. Busemeyer, J. T. Townsend, Z. Wang, & A. Eidels (Eds.), Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
- Bays, P. M., Catalao, R. F., & Husain, M. (2009). The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. Journal of Vision, 9(10), 7. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.10.7
-
- Bennett, D., Murawski, C., & Bode, S. (2015). Single-trial event-related potential correlates of belief updating. ENeuro, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0076-15.2015
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources