Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May 1;11(5):e432-e438.
doi: 10.4317/jced.55709. eCollection 2019 May.

Which factors influence orthodontists in their decision to extract? A questionnaire survey

Astrid Evrard  1 , Michele Tepedino  2 , Paolo M Cattaneo  3 , Marie A Cornelis  3
Affiliations

Which factors influence orthodontists in their decision to extract? A questionnaire survey

Astrid Evrard et al. J Clin Exp Dent. .

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the relative influence of different criteria in the choice between extraction and nonextraction treatment in current orthodontics, and to assess how the percentage of extractions has evolved over time.

Material and methods: Pre-treatment records (panoramic radiograph, lateral cephalogram, study casts and photographs) of fourteen cases in permanent dentition (adult or adolescent) with class I molar relationship and moderate anterior crowding were evaluated by 28 orthodontists. For each case, each orthodontist filled out a questionnaire reporting his treatment plan proposal (extraction or nonextraction) and the importance of specific parameters in his decision-making process, using categorical scales. Orthodontists practicing for more than 15 years were also asked to compare this decision with the one they would have taken at the beginning of their professional career.

Results: The two most important factors in the decision-making were the soft tissue profile and the amount of crowding. The least important factor was the presence of third molars. In cases of nonextraction treatment, the lack of space was managed mostly by dental expansion and stripping. Twenty percent of the case evaluations revealed extraction(s) decisions. Among the orthodontists practicing for more than 15 years, the current extraction rate reached 24%, whereas the same orthodontists reported they would have extracted in 39% of the cases in the past.

Conclusions: The present study suggests that soft tissue profile has a higher impact than traditional criteria such as cephalometric measurements in the extraction decision. This is associated with a decreased extractions rate compared to the past. Key words:Orthodontics, extractions, survey, treatment planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement:The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Importance of evaluated parameters for treatment planning (0: no importance for treatment planning – 4 : very important for treatment planning).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nonextraction treatments: distribution of frequencies of methods used for space management (orthodontists could choose more than one).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Extraction treatments: Patterns of combined extractions in the upper and lower jaws (a); Distribution of frequencies of individually extracted teeth (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Types of retention used by the orthodontists at the beginning of their career (a) and at the time of the survey (b).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St-Louis, MO: Elsevier;2007:276–279.
    1. Case CS. The question of extraction in orthodontia. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:660–691.
    1. Tweed CH. Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedures. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1944;30:405–428. - PubMed
    1. Tweed CH. The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:651–657. - PubMed
    1. Miura F, Nakagawa K, Masuhara E. New direct bonding system for plastic brackets. Am J Orthod. 1971;59:350–61. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources