Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun 2:2019:8132520.
doi: 10.1155/2019/8132520. eCollection 2019.

Influence of Insertion Torque on Clinical and Biological Outcomes before and after Loading of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures in Atrophic Edentulous Mandibles

Affiliations

Influence of Insertion Torque on Clinical and Biological Outcomes before and after Loading of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures in Atrophic Edentulous Mandibles

Fernanda Faot et al. Biomed Res Int. .

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the influence of primary insertion torque (IT) values of narrow dental implants on the peri-implant health, implant stability, immunoinflammatory responses, bone loss, and success and survival rates.

Methods: Thirty-one edentulous patients received two narrow implants (2.9x10mm, Facility NeoPoros) to retain mandibular overdentures. The implants were categorized in four groups according to their IT: (G1) IT > 10 Ncm; (G2) IT ≥ 10Ncm and ≤ 30 Ncm; (G3) IT >30Ncm and < 45Ncm; (G4) IT ≥ 45Ncm, and all implants were loaded after 3 months of healing. The following clinical outcomes were evaluated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implant insertion: (i) peri-implant tissue health (PH), gingival index (GI), plaque index (PI), calculus presence (CP), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP); (ii) implant stability quotient (ISQ) by resonance frequency analysis; and (iii) IL-1β and TNF-α concentration in the peri-implant crevicular fluid. The marginal bone level (MBL) and changes (MBC) were evaluated. The Chi2 test, Kruskal-Wallis test, mixed-effects regression analysis, and the Kendall rank correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis (α = 5%).

Results: G1 presented the highest PD at all evaluated periods. G2 presented higher PI at month 6 and 12. G4 showed increased GI at month 3 and 12 and more CP at month 1 (p=.003). G2 and G4 had higher ISQ values over the study period, while those from G1 and G3 presented lower ISQ values. The IL-1β concentration increased until month 12 and was independent of IT and bone type; G4 had a higher IL-1β concentration in month 3 than the other groups (p=.015). The TNF-α release was negatively correlated with IT, and TNF-α release was highest in G1 at month 12. The MBL immediately after surgery and the MBC at month 12 were similar between the groups, and G4 presented a positive MBC at month 12. The survival and success rates were 75% for G1, 81.3% for G2, 64.3% for G3, and 95% for G4.

Conclusion: The IT did not influence the clinical outcomes and the peri-implant immunoinflammatory responses and was weakly correlated with the narrow dental implants primary stability. The observed success rates suggest that the ideal IT for atrophic fully edentulous patients may deviate from the standardized IT of 32 Ncm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of the experimental design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Medians (min-max) of implant stability, probing depth and proinflammatory markers over the evaluation time for al implants (different letters indicate statistically significant differences; the estimates given are standardized coefficients with respective 95% confidence intervals).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparisons between the medians (min-max) of the implant stability, probing depth, and proinflammatory markers outcomes between groups at different evaluation periods (Kruskall-Wallis independent analyses, p<0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Dispersion diagrams showing the correlations between the probing depth (PD) and time since edentulism and (b) between the PD and bone atrophy according to the anterior mandibular height. (c) Box-plot showing the PD according bone type, bone atrophy, and time since edentulism. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences; the estimates given are standardized coefficients with respective 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan-Meier survival curve for each Insertion Torque group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buser D., Sennerby L., De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73(1):7–21. doi: 10.1111/prd.12185. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chrcanovic B. R., Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. Reasons for failures of oral implants. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2014;41(6):443–476. doi: 10.1111/joor.12157. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albrektsson T., Chrcanovic B., Östman P.-O., Sennerby L. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants. Periodontology 2000. 2017;73(1):41–50. doi: 10.1111/prd.12176. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sennerby L., Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontology 2000. 2008;47(1):51–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duyck J., Roesems R., Cardoso M. V., Ogawa T., De Villa Camargos G., Vandamme K. Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015;26(2):191–196. doi: 10.1111/clr.12316. - DOI - PubMed